disgusting... i want to find a video of this on the web RIGHT NOW... i saw it during the replay after the game on espn.com and was totally blown away. it's stuff like this that made me like ben wallace so much.
"Prince had a steal and a dunk, then on the ensuing possession Ben Wallace brought the crowd to its feet.
Just when O'Neal was about to throw down another one of his backboard-shaking dunks, the 6-foot-7 Wallace leaped and stunted O'Neal's slam -- forcing a jump ball, and putting the 7-1 O'Neal on his back.
About a minute later, Wallace's three-point play -- yes, he made the free throw -- gave the Pistons a 60-53 lead."
he did it one-handed... against shaq going two-handed... dis... gus... ting...
Wednesday, May 31, 2006
alpha collection for ps2 comes out on june 11. 29.99. contains all versions of street fighter alpha, includes street fighter zero 2 alpha(can play as cammy, evil ryu, sunburnt sakura and various sf2 versions of characters), a special customizable version of sfa3(adds guile, evil ryu, fei long, t hawk and dee jay as well as a ton of customizable options), but most importantly, including an actual arcade-perfect sfa3. all previous versions of sfa3 were not arcade perfect, which meant unless you broke the law by dling emulators and roms or bought an actual arcade cab, you couldn't practice for any tournaments at home. now it's possible.
using charge characters, you can speed up the time you can fire off specials by doing precharged specials. in example, using guile, his sonic boom is b 2 seconds, f+p. now, do it as b 2 seconds, f~b~p or f~db~p. get it? this even works on the ssf2t, which is how daigo made his balrog look so scary against john choi in evo 2k4(i have the match video on my cpu).
i don't play mvc2 or really watch it anymore, but i still enjoy videos of duc do playing. nobody else uses spiral quite like he does. no one even USES anybody as a main outside of the top 4. but he does. and it's crazy.
ssf2t does not enable you to do "rapid-tap specials" like chun's lightning legs by the piano motion(short~forward~roundhouse~short~roundhouse); in fact, of all the sf games that are still played, only cvs2 allows you to do this. you need to press the same button quickly(in 3rd strike, you press the same button 4x before 2 seconds are up). however, you can double-tap twice on a button 2x, and that should do it. like use your index and middle finger to drum on forward 2x. unfortunately, it's quite difficult to do any rapid-tap specials without needing to buffer it first. chun-li could be so much higher if you could do it right straight out.
spd(spinning pile driver) does not require a full 360 motion. it only requires a 270. this is actually common knowledge. in fact, debatably you only need a 5/8th of a circle(so rotate from forward to up-back), but i believe the shortest way to do a 720 super is to do a 360+180, and since supers in capcom games are usually "double-pumps" of a special, i'm guessing you need to do a 270 as a regular 360. i'm still in amazement of those who can pull off "standing 270" in ssf2t, so maybe you do need to do a 5/8, not 6/8(270).
if i don't get a ps2-to-usb adapter that actually works with the joystick i got, i will have wasted 20 dollars for plunking down something for approx 1 year. i plan to EVENTUALLY get a ps2 so that i don't waste the money i used to get vf4evo and ttt, but i dunno how long til. i still WOULD like to play with a joystick on my cpu, so that i can actually practice for st and a3, since both are still played at sunnyvale golfland.
using charge characters, you can speed up the time you can fire off specials by doing precharged specials. in example, using guile, his sonic boom is b 2 seconds, f+p. now, do it as b 2 seconds, f~b~p or f~db~p. get it? this even works on the ssf2t, which is how daigo made his balrog look so scary against john choi in evo 2k4(i have the match video on my cpu).
i don't play mvc2 or really watch it anymore, but i still enjoy videos of duc do playing. nobody else uses spiral quite like he does. no one even USES anybody as a main outside of the top 4. but he does. and it's crazy.
ssf2t does not enable you to do "rapid-tap specials" like chun's lightning legs by the piano motion(short~forward~roundhouse~short~roundhouse); in fact, of all the sf games that are still played, only cvs2 allows you to do this. you need to press the same button quickly(in 3rd strike, you press the same button 4x before 2 seconds are up). however, you can double-tap twice on a button 2x, and that should do it. like use your index and middle finger to drum on forward 2x. unfortunately, it's quite difficult to do any rapid-tap specials without needing to buffer it first. chun-li could be so much higher if you could do it right straight out.
spd(spinning pile driver) does not require a full 360 motion. it only requires a 270. this is actually common knowledge. in fact, debatably you only need a 5/8th of a circle(so rotate from forward to up-back), but i believe the shortest way to do a 720 super is to do a 360+180, and since supers in capcom games are usually "double-pumps" of a special, i'm guessing you need to do a 270 as a regular 360. i'm still in amazement of those who can pull off "standing 270" in ssf2t, so maybe you do need to do a 5/8, not 6/8(270).
if i don't get a ps2-to-usb adapter that actually works with the joystick i got, i will have wasted 20 dollars for plunking down something for approx 1 year. i plan to EVENTUALLY get a ps2 so that i don't waste the money i used to get vf4evo and ttt, but i dunno how long til. i still WOULD like to play with a joystick on my cpu, so that i can actually practice for st and a3, since both are still played at sunnyvale golfland.
i really don't know whether to say the pistons are the model for the nba anymore... they might even be the ANTIMODEL of the league.
ok, yeah, they have the best starting 5 in the nba. that's an organizational success on joe dumars' part.
but as of late, the way they approach games is very kobe-shaq laker-ish...
-act like they can just turn it on when it matters(i think they blur the line between confidence and cockiness way too often; i don't see the sense of urgency at all until they're muddled deep)
-rely more upon their offense than their defense to win
-maybe try to rely too much upon getting calls?
-i want to say this is part of flip's doing, but i think flip knew what the pistons needed to work on, and so strayed away from the 1-on-1 lockdown D THINKING that the players would always know how to play it. it's probably both sides' fault; flip for not emphasizing it and urgency, and the players for not doing it.
even if they win tonight, will they carry that same sense of urgency into miami? or that sense of cockiness?
that said, even if the pistons get knocked out, they'll come back the next year. i expect it. and san antonio too. they just need a reality check.
that being said, maybe it IS good that the pistons get knocked out; i really need to finish the rest of this quarter strong.
ok, yeah, they have the best starting 5 in the nba. that's an organizational success on joe dumars' part.
but as of late, the way they approach games is very kobe-shaq laker-ish...
-act like they can just turn it on when it matters(i think they blur the line between confidence and cockiness way too often; i don't see the sense of urgency at all until they're muddled deep)
-rely more upon their offense than their defense to win
-maybe try to rely too much upon getting calls?
-i want to say this is part of flip's doing, but i think flip knew what the pistons needed to work on, and so strayed away from the 1-on-1 lockdown D THINKING that the players would always know how to play it. it's probably both sides' fault; flip for not emphasizing it and urgency, and the players for not doing it.
even if they win tonight, will they carry that same sense of urgency into miami? or that sense of cockiness?
that said, even if the pistons get knocked out, they'll come back the next year. i expect it. and san antonio too. they just need a reality check.
that being said, maybe it IS good that the pistons get knocked out; i really need to finish the rest of this quarter strong.
Tuesday, May 30, 2006
Saturday, May 27, 2006
Friday, May 26, 2006
GameTrailers.com - User Movie: Virtua Fighter 4 ft SBO Finals 2k5 by BacardiJ
the Akira player's sick...
KG, SPoD(P+K+G,b,df+P+G,f+P) pwns you...
the Akira player's sick...
KG, SPoD(P+K+G,b,df+P+G,f+P) pwns you...
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
YouTube - Final Fight Revenge (Sega Saturn): Hilarious Match Video
i have never laughed so hard at a fighting game.
i have never laughed so hard at a fighting game.
Monday, May 22, 2006
the more i think about it, the more i realize i am totally old school... throwback in a world of modernization. to an extent. has to do mainly with a lot of the principles that i live by. i think a lot of it may have had to do with my mom. my mom's totally throwback. i'll admit that i don't actually achieve a lot of them, but just by thinking of them consciously and trying to always aim for it says a lot.
the reason i hate camping trips is b/c most ppl i have tried to camp with only want to talk and not shut up and let you sleep at night. i don't care what you talk about, even if it's something i would be interested in talking about, LET ME SLEEP! God bless "old" ppl who just want to fall asleep on trips and give you resting space, knowing they've got stuff to do the next day.
and i don't fall asleep too easily if i hear ANYTHING.
as a result, to put it quite bluntly, i feel like crap the following day.
if it weren't for that reason, and possibly the fact that i hate the long drive wherever we needs go, it would be a lot better; i love nature. really.
(so lake tahoe was ok i guess; ok, in that if i could've gotten better sleep, it would've been great. i guess i'll add getting a digital camera to my future list of wants, b/c as of late the only thing i really can use to hold onto each trip are memories)
---
just when i think detroit has lost their defensive mentality that i've grown to love, they bring it in a game 7 lockdown. so i guess doubling wasn't necessarily a bad idea on detroit's part; i did hear they pretty much threw every single type of defensive scheme at james the 2nd half. it just was that detroit wasn't really focused in the oh, 2nd through 5th games.
now, san antonio just needs to follow suit on monday to show that both back-to-back champs still mean (defensive) business.
(fyi, i've heard some talk about how rasheed might be the pistons' best player. i've heard talk about that for billups, and also for ben, but if you think about it, rasheed makes a very good case(rip has yet to show he can take over in the playoffs, and prince sadly as good of an all-around player, doesn't scare ppl on the offensive end). offensively, he gives them a low post presence; it's obviously nothing compared to duncan's, but it's still enough to give them an up-close shot when they need it. if rasheed's low post game goes to hell, there's a pretty good chance the pistons will lose. and don't forget how great of a spot-up 3 point shooter he is. that gives billups and hamilton the freedom to be more aggressive in attacking the hoop, knowing they can also kick it back out to rasheed if things aren't going well. if his shot does not fall from the outside, it also puts more pressure on billups and rip. on top of all that, he brings the typical stuff that the unselfish big men on the pistons usually always do; set screens, rebound well, defend well(in rasheed's case, defend big men 1-on-1 well). but like i've said, he also brings the underdog mentality to the pistons' team, something that i truly believe, adds 10 extra wins to their regular playoff game list, and a couple extra wins they squeak out in the playoffs)
that being said, if there is any possible hall-of-famers on this pistons team, it will probably only be ben wallace, but for good reason. the guy is a rock on defense. basically, while his shot blocking's terrifying, and his rebounding skills, if comes down to that if you pick and roll against him, the fact that the guard does NOT carry an advantage in speed that makes ben so special. the list of centers that successfully can defend pick-and-rolls by switching are very few, and even then, for only a limited amount of time, at a certain area on the court; once the timing gets longer, the chances of the offensive guard crossing over the center and driving or pulling back and launching a wide-open trey becomes higher and higher. with ben, the advantage that the guard carries is about 5.5/4.5 i would say, whereas, against an average center, the advantage is like 7/3, vs a good defensive center, MAYBE 6/4, but more like 6.5/3.5 in most aspects. the guy is HORRID on offense in all aspects(except for rebounding, haha), but his defense more than makes up for it. if you're having trouble believing how a guy can suck that bad on offense, but be so good on defense, i like to believe that ben wallace is one of those ppl who just has really bad finger coordination; he would NOT be able to play any stringed instrument. you need finger coordination on offense to handle the ball properly. not so much when you're trying to swat it out of the air, or grab it and pull it down.
billups has been really great, but the argument is that he wasn't really good until he got to the pistons, which incidently, is when good players surrounded him. of course, we also need to realize he got better in all aspects when he got to detroit; defense, clutch shooting, giving the ball up to the right guy, etc. rip and tayshaun haven't hit that level yet, and rasheed just wants to be a role player, not the main guy.
and i don't fall asleep too easily if i hear ANYTHING.
as a result, to put it quite bluntly, i feel like crap the following day.
if it weren't for that reason, and possibly the fact that i hate the long drive wherever we needs go, it would be a lot better; i love nature. really.
(so lake tahoe was ok i guess; ok, in that if i could've gotten better sleep, it would've been great. i guess i'll add getting a digital camera to my future list of wants, b/c as of late the only thing i really can use to hold onto each trip are memories)
---
just when i think detroit has lost their defensive mentality that i've grown to love, they bring it in a game 7 lockdown. so i guess doubling wasn't necessarily a bad idea on detroit's part; i did hear they pretty much threw every single type of defensive scheme at james the 2nd half. it just was that detroit wasn't really focused in the oh, 2nd through 5th games.
now, san antonio just needs to follow suit on monday to show that both back-to-back champs still mean (defensive) business.
(fyi, i've heard some talk about how rasheed might be the pistons' best player. i've heard talk about that for billups, and also for ben, but if you think about it, rasheed makes a very good case(rip has yet to show he can take over in the playoffs, and prince sadly as good of an all-around player, doesn't scare ppl on the offensive end). offensively, he gives them a low post presence; it's obviously nothing compared to duncan's, but it's still enough to give them an up-close shot when they need it. if rasheed's low post game goes to hell, there's a pretty good chance the pistons will lose. and don't forget how great of a spot-up 3 point shooter he is. that gives billups and hamilton the freedom to be more aggressive in attacking the hoop, knowing they can also kick it back out to rasheed if things aren't going well. if his shot does not fall from the outside, it also puts more pressure on billups and rip. on top of all that, he brings the typical stuff that the unselfish big men on the pistons usually always do; set screens, rebound well, defend well(in rasheed's case, defend big men 1-on-1 well). but like i've said, he also brings the underdog mentality to the pistons' team, something that i truly believe, adds 10 extra wins to their regular playoff game list, and a couple extra wins they squeak out in the playoffs)
that being said, if there is any possible hall-of-famers on this pistons team, it will probably only be ben wallace, but for good reason. the guy is a rock on defense. basically, while his shot blocking's terrifying, and his rebounding skills, if comes down to that if you pick and roll against him, the fact that the guard does NOT carry an advantage in speed that makes ben so special. the list of centers that successfully can defend pick-and-rolls by switching are very few, and even then, for only a limited amount of time, at a certain area on the court; once the timing gets longer, the chances of the offensive guard crossing over the center and driving or pulling back and launching a wide-open trey becomes higher and higher. with ben, the advantage that the guard carries is about 5.5/4.5 i would say, whereas, against an average center, the advantage is like 7/3, vs a good defensive center, MAYBE 6/4, but more like 6.5/3.5 in most aspects. the guy is HORRID on offense in all aspects(except for rebounding, haha), but his defense more than makes up for it. if you're having trouble believing how a guy can suck that bad on offense, but be so good on defense, i like to believe that ben wallace is one of those ppl who just has really bad finger coordination; he would NOT be able to play any stringed instrument. you need finger coordination on offense to handle the ball properly. not so much when you're trying to swat it out of the air, or grab it and pull it down.
billups has been really great, but the argument is that he wasn't really good until he got to the pistons, which incidently, is when good players surrounded him. of course, we also need to realize he got better in all aspects when he got to detroit; defense, clutch shooting, giving the ball up to the right guy, etc. rip and tayshaun haven't hit that level yet, and rasheed just wants to be a role player, not the main guy.
Thursday, May 18, 2006
The ultimate skill is to take up a position where you are formless. If you are formless, the most penetrating spies will not be able to discern you, nor the wisest counsels be able to do calculations against you. Therefore, your strategy for victories in battle is not repititious, and your formations in response to the enemy are endless. Those who are able to adapt and change in accord with the enemy and achieve victory are called divine.
-Sun Tzu
(applies to pretty much any competitive event you ever do; fighting games, bball, board games)
-Sun Tzu
(applies to pretty much any competitive event you ever do; fighting games, bball, board games)
funny how at the beginning i thought there might not be a pistons-spurs rematch.
now there's a very good chance both teams won't even MAKE it. (the little good news is that both teams still aren't dead yet)
all those TINY things that i had against flip saunders' coaching is starting to come out as i stunningly find the pistons 1 game loss away from ending their chances of going back to the finals. and not even against the heat or nets. spurs possibly losing to the mavericks isn't so bad of a stunner, because everybody knew dallas was THAT much better this year. the fact that pistons are getting beat by a team they should've routed in 5 games though is rediculous.
but going back to the afterthoughts i've had about flip's philosophy:
for instance, i've always had afterthoughts about double-teaming, considering how good each of the pistons can play 1-on-1. if each of the pistons are that good, why double-team when you know it'll just leave a gaping hole open? it's hurting them, because it's not even really containing lebron, and all these role-players are beating the pistons. i'm not even too sure prince is doing that good of a job containing lebron. in my opinion, billups, hunter, even rip have done better jobs, because it seems that prince's big weakness on defense is he's too frail to fight through screens and still keep pace.
charles barkeley is right in that sometimes detroit feels that they can win games alone with their OFFENSE this year. this is showing in 2 ways; sometimes they rush their shots, and they are STILL a jump-shooting team. they're not being aggressive offensively. and they're looking at offense as a way to beat the opponents, rather than a supplement to their defense.
that being said, maybe the injuries to rip and sheed are what are hurting this team the most this series. rip's been off, and sheed's been off, which gets rid of MANY 3s that could've been hit. with that, you put the majority of the pressure on billups and prince to play your offense, along with antonio coming off the bench.
i still don't see the urgency and desire detroit needs to exhibit in order to win this series. cleveland has been containing lanes much more better on defense and playing their game on offense. lebron james has been nothing short of spectactular, as he has basically been unguardable, and finding open guys that easily. on top of that, his teammates when they get the ball DO finish.
i've had afterthoughts about what type of impact flip would have on the pistons at the beginning of the season like many, but it was quickly squashed in the season by their wins. now, at least to me, larry brown's coaching is looking VERY good.
pistons just don't seem to have that fire that they had in the past. the good news is that they have gotten out of a 3-2 hole on the road before. let's see if they get complacent or not.
---
on a side note, duncan looked VERY, VERY, good.
now there's a very good chance both teams won't even MAKE it. (the little good news is that both teams still aren't dead yet)
all those TINY things that i had against flip saunders' coaching is starting to come out as i stunningly find the pistons 1 game loss away from ending their chances of going back to the finals. and not even against the heat or nets. spurs possibly losing to the mavericks isn't so bad of a stunner, because everybody knew dallas was THAT much better this year. the fact that pistons are getting beat by a team they should've routed in 5 games though is rediculous.
but going back to the afterthoughts i've had about flip's philosophy:
for instance, i've always had afterthoughts about double-teaming, considering how good each of the pistons can play 1-on-1. if each of the pistons are that good, why double-team when you know it'll just leave a gaping hole open? it's hurting them, because it's not even really containing lebron, and all these role-players are beating the pistons. i'm not even too sure prince is doing that good of a job containing lebron. in my opinion, billups, hunter, even rip have done better jobs, because it seems that prince's big weakness on defense is he's too frail to fight through screens and still keep pace.
charles barkeley is right in that sometimes detroit feels that they can win games alone with their OFFENSE this year. this is showing in 2 ways; sometimes they rush their shots, and they are STILL a jump-shooting team. they're not being aggressive offensively. and they're looking at offense as a way to beat the opponents, rather than a supplement to their defense.
that being said, maybe the injuries to rip and sheed are what are hurting this team the most this series. rip's been off, and sheed's been off, which gets rid of MANY 3s that could've been hit. with that, you put the majority of the pressure on billups and prince to play your offense, along with antonio coming off the bench.
i still don't see the urgency and desire detroit needs to exhibit in order to win this series. cleveland has been containing lanes much more better on defense and playing their game on offense. lebron james has been nothing short of spectactular, as he has basically been unguardable, and finding open guys that easily. on top of that, his teammates when they get the ball DO finish.
i've had afterthoughts about what type of impact flip would have on the pistons at the beginning of the season like many, but it was quickly squashed in the season by their wins. now, at least to me, larry brown's coaching is looking VERY good.
pistons just don't seem to have that fire that they had in the past. the good news is that they have gotten out of a 3-2 hole on the road before. let's see if they get complacent or not.
---
on a side note, duncan looked VERY, VERY, good.
Monday, May 15, 2006
cavs definitely aint the bucks. that's why this series is knotted up 2 all instead of 3-1. that said, the game was still close all the way to the end, and it could've been 3-1 at the end of this game as opposed as to 2-2, but since it's knotted up and i like the pistons too much, i'm sitting here shaking my head.
lbj was nothing short of spectactular tonight; his long-range jumpers were falling, and eric snow was really good tonight. while lbj was the catalyst of this game's victory, everybody was hitting jumpers. so much about pistons being this tough interior defensive team.
whoever wrote on espn that the pistons are still primarily a jumpshooting team is right. i think this is what makes their offense not 100% dangerous. i think it can help them a bit, because it can help them stay injury-free. and when they get hot, you can't stop them. but it also gets rid of the ability to create shots when your jumpers can't fall. and when they went cold, as they did tonight, it hurt them.
prince needs to work on his post-up game into baby hook and go back to it as his main weapon; i thought when the pistons were controlling the game offensively was when they stopped going for jumpers and letting prince get in and give lbj fits on the defensive end. prince's in-close, post-up game is better than some ppl realize. i think the biggest way the pistons are going to get better offensively is how well prince becomes on his post-up game.
this is one TINY thing i'm holding against the pistons this year compared to last 2 years. yes, their offense is better, and yes, that does lead to a slight dip defensively. but larry brown had this "asian mentality" when he coaches you(remember your mom which hammered you in high school about that 1 B you got in a flurry of A's on your report card?). you could execute 90% of your plays to perfection in a game, and he would hammer you about the 10% plays you didn't after a game. i really do get the feeling that this year, the pistons have a "flip the switch" mentality; let's turn it on when we're down 10, as opposed to flipping it on before a game and breaking the switch off. and it's kinda helped by the fact that flip is a laid back coach. i see their lockdown defense only coming out in spurts as opposed to all 48 minutes. they're not focused all 48 minutes of a game.
basically, what i'm saying is that those 5% plays you didn't execute to perfection in the 1st quarter will come back to haunt you in a close game in the 4th. it's EASY to blow off those plays when you blow the opponent out. but basketball is such a high scoring game, that you really shouldn't have that mentality at all(t-mac goes for about 12 in 1 minute? miller gets 6 in about 8 seconds?). and tonight, that was the case when the pistons played against the cavs. if you took away 5 plays where the pistons tried to nail a jump shot and replaced them with situations where they let prince post up, or just take it in instead of a jumper, or some plays where they did not double when defending james, the outcome of this game could've been different.
but hey, i don't play the games; i just watch them. i COULD be wrong.
---
so, this is what i'm speculating: if larry brown leaves the knicks(didn't expect this to happen, but i would guess this is the most likely scenario), he will end up as the kings' new head coach. and why not; kings are becoming a much more physical team than in the past, relying on hustle and defense to win games more. and who better to bring in than that guy? they even stated that they were going to pass up don nelson.
(personally, i would like larry brown to coach the warriors; mike montgomery is a bit too laid back on the warriors, which may be why they suck so much defensively, and don nelson is not known for being a defensively genius, but bringing in rick adelman wouldn't be a bad idea either)
---
i think that if you're not an asian, you believe the stereotype that ALL asians can't drive. lemme correct this, and say it's not ALL asians. just the ones which have kids in the back and are FOBs. i guess every one of my taiwanese/korean acquaintances knows this, but i had to say it. ever see them drive 20 miles/hour slower than everybody else?
---
i REALLY should try to get rid of as much on my cpu as soon as possible onto cds and defragment this sucker... it's almost unbearable opening a program. problem is i keep finding online stuff to keep.
lbj was nothing short of spectactular tonight; his long-range jumpers were falling, and eric snow was really good tonight. while lbj was the catalyst of this game's victory, everybody was hitting jumpers. so much about pistons being this tough interior defensive team.
whoever wrote on espn that the pistons are still primarily a jumpshooting team is right. i think this is what makes their offense not 100% dangerous. i think it can help them a bit, because it can help them stay injury-free. and when they get hot, you can't stop them. but it also gets rid of the ability to create shots when your jumpers can't fall. and when they went cold, as they did tonight, it hurt them.
prince needs to work on his post-up game into baby hook and go back to it as his main weapon; i thought when the pistons were controlling the game offensively was when they stopped going for jumpers and letting prince get in and give lbj fits on the defensive end. prince's in-close, post-up game is better than some ppl realize. i think the biggest way the pistons are going to get better offensively is how well prince becomes on his post-up game.
this is one TINY thing i'm holding against the pistons this year compared to last 2 years. yes, their offense is better, and yes, that does lead to a slight dip defensively. but larry brown had this "asian mentality" when he coaches you(remember your mom which hammered you in high school about that 1 B you got in a flurry of A's on your report card?). you could execute 90% of your plays to perfection in a game, and he would hammer you about the 10% plays you didn't after a game. i really do get the feeling that this year, the pistons have a "flip the switch" mentality; let's turn it on when we're down 10, as opposed to flipping it on before a game and breaking the switch off. and it's kinda helped by the fact that flip is a laid back coach. i see their lockdown defense only coming out in spurts as opposed to all 48 minutes. they're not focused all 48 minutes of a game.
basically, what i'm saying is that those 5% plays you didn't execute to perfection in the 1st quarter will come back to haunt you in a close game in the 4th. it's EASY to blow off those plays when you blow the opponent out. but basketball is such a high scoring game, that you really shouldn't have that mentality at all(t-mac goes for about 12 in 1 minute? miller gets 6 in about 8 seconds?). and tonight, that was the case when the pistons played against the cavs. if you took away 5 plays where the pistons tried to nail a jump shot and replaced them with situations where they let prince post up, or just take it in instead of a jumper, or some plays where they did not double when defending james, the outcome of this game could've been different.
but hey, i don't play the games; i just watch them. i COULD be wrong.
---
so, this is what i'm speculating: if larry brown leaves the knicks(didn't expect this to happen, but i would guess this is the most likely scenario), he will end up as the kings' new head coach. and why not; kings are becoming a much more physical team than in the past, relying on hustle and defense to win games more. and who better to bring in than that guy? they even stated that they were going to pass up don nelson.
(personally, i would like larry brown to coach the warriors; mike montgomery is a bit too laid back on the warriors, which may be why they suck so much defensively, and don nelson is not known for being a defensively genius, but bringing in rick adelman wouldn't be a bad idea either)
---
i think that if you're not an asian, you believe the stereotype that ALL asians can't drive. lemme correct this, and say it's not ALL asians. just the ones which have kids in the back and are FOBs. i guess every one of my taiwanese/korean acquaintances knows this, but i had to say it. ever see them drive 20 miles/hour slower than everybody else?
---
i REALLY should try to get rid of as much on my cpu as soon as possible onto cds and defragment this sucker... it's almost unbearable opening a program. problem is i keep finding online stuff to keep.
Sunday, May 14, 2006
fyi, if you still think sheed's bad for the nba, i suggest you go to www.need4sheed.com, and click on the videos section. then watch the interview he did with stephen a. smith. you'll hear that he actually tries to cut down on the t's, it's just that the refs aren't allowing him to vent his anger in any way. give him a t for not talking, but just giving a dirty look? ok, so let's try something else; but now you're giving him a t for laughing it off? are you crazy?
(while you're there, if you're bored, you can watch sheed making fun of reggie miller prior to game 5(haha), or the interviews billups has w/best damn and stephen a. smith. i like how billups tells stephen a. to pick the spurs so that the pistons'll win this year(since he didn't in 04 and did in 05); stephen a was like "man, you're killing me, you're gonna make me look bad either way.")
btw, sheed's at it again... he made another declaration... i WANT to say it's guaren-SHEED, but i'm leaning more towards 70% it's guaren-SHEED.
some will say that what he's doing is cocky... i understand that, at the same time, i think he does it more to motivate his teammates; he puts his neck out there, knowing it'll raise his teammates' game; i mean, this discussion has been done in the past, on espn.com, during the year they had to play against the pacers to win the eastern conference crown, and again, against the heat to preserve their eastern conference crown.
btw, this is just an observation, but i think the cavs have done better against the pistons WITHOUT hughes. the times he was in, he sucked like crap. then again, i'm basically basing this upon 1 game. we'll see if it still holds true come game 4.
it was funny at first, but now it's just become milked to death how many people are making fun of the nike commercial saying "we are all witnesses" to lebron james growing up, but now getting beat by the pistons in games 1 and 2. i'm sure you've heard it; "of course we're all witnesses... witnesses to an ass-whupping"
-------
spurs should've picked devin harris instead of "futilely" trying to chase jason kidd. it's hurting them now. btw, game 3 was really, really good from what i heard.
i thought the number of sports fans still think detroit's boring and want them to lose, but the last time i checked, the espn poll asking what matchup would you want for the eastern conference crown had pistons against heat leading by a huge margin ahead of everything else. ppl still think the spurs are boring though(or maybe not boring outside of duncan, but it is becoming a bit annoying how ginobili repeatedly tries to sell himself to the refs, and bowen gets away with stuff no one else does). i still watch spurs games in good interest; to learn tim duncan's low post offense and defense, and get amazed by bowen's defense(or at least, try to figure out why so many people dislike him as a defensive player), and parker's slashing. i also like horry. but i'll admit, while i don't dislike ginobili and bowen yet, both are slowly starting to wear thin on me.
heat are SO... SO... streaky. they really ARE the lakers of 04. one game they're terrifying to play against, the next they wilt and lose by 20. i still believe they'll give detroit the biggest problems on their way back to the finals, but i am so confused as to what heat team is going to show up. do they play russian roulette in the locker room and then by those results decide whether to play hard to just give up a game? just go by a "spin the bottle?"
(while you're there, if you're bored, you can watch sheed making fun of reggie miller prior to game 5(haha), or the interviews billups has w/best damn and stephen a. smith. i like how billups tells stephen a. to pick the spurs so that the pistons'll win this year(since he didn't in 04 and did in 05); stephen a was like "man, you're killing me, you're gonna make me look bad either way.")
btw, sheed's at it again... he made another declaration... i WANT to say it's guaren-SHEED, but i'm leaning more towards 70% it's guaren-SHEED.
some will say that what he's doing is cocky... i understand that, at the same time, i think he does it more to motivate his teammates; he puts his neck out there, knowing it'll raise his teammates' game; i mean, this discussion has been done in the past, on espn.com, during the year they had to play against the pacers to win the eastern conference crown, and again, against the heat to preserve their eastern conference crown.
btw, this is just an observation, but i think the cavs have done better against the pistons WITHOUT hughes. the times he was in, he sucked like crap. then again, i'm basically basing this upon 1 game. we'll see if it still holds true come game 4.
it was funny at first, but now it's just become milked to death how many people are making fun of the nike commercial saying "we are all witnesses" to lebron james growing up, but now getting beat by the pistons in games 1 and 2. i'm sure you've heard it; "of course we're all witnesses... witnesses to an ass-whupping"
-------
spurs should've picked devin harris instead of "futilely" trying to chase jason kidd. it's hurting them now. btw, game 3 was really, really good from what i heard.
i thought the number of sports fans still think detroit's boring and want them to lose, but the last time i checked, the espn poll asking what matchup would you want for the eastern conference crown had pistons against heat leading by a huge margin ahead of everything else. ppl still think the spurs are boring though(or maybe not boring outside of duncan, but it is becoming a bit annoying how ginobili repeatedly tries to sell himself to the refs, and bowen gets away with stuff no one else does). i still watch spurs games in good interest; to learn tim duncan's low post offense and defense, and get amazed by bowen's defense(or at least, try to figure out why so many people dislike him as a defensive player), and parker's slashing. i also like horry. but i'll admit, while i don't dislike ginobili and bowen yet, both are slowly starting to wear thin on me.
heat are SO... SO... streaky. they really ARE the lakers of 04. one game they're terrifying to play against, the next they wilt and lose by 20. i still believe they'll give detroit the biggest problems on their way back to the finals, but i am so confused as to what heat team is going to show up. do they play russian roulette in the locker room and then by those results decide whether to play hard to just give up a game? just go by a "spin the bottle?"
Saturday, May 13, 2006
i love defense, anyways:
defensive player of the year:
ben wallace
1st all-defensive nba team:
jason kidd
kobe bryant
bruce bowen
ron artest
andre kirelinko
ben wallace
(there are 6 players on the 1st defensive all-nba team b/c bowen actually TIED with wallace for being on the 1st all nba team; bowen actually had more points selected(55 to 54), but 1 of those points was on the 2nd all-nba defensive team(3 to wallace's 2); take that as what you may)
2nd all-defensive nba team:
chauncey billups
tayshaun prince
kevin garnett
tim duncan
marcus camby
comments:
for the most part, i agree with these ranks. ak's a tremendous defensive player, i love the guy; most deserving of the 1st team. i'm surprised ron's still on the 1st team, but he's really good, perhaps he's just leagues above everybody else on the kings, and most of the games he just presents matchup problems for the others he's guarding. kobe's kobe, can't deny that. jason kidd does everything BUT score, so yeah.
on the 2nd team: i think for chauncey and tayshaun to get into the 1st team, they need to really start tightening up. i get the feeling that tayshaun doesn't seem as dominant as his 1st 2 years on the defensive end; maybe that's cause ppl are getting used to him, but he used to just make ppl miss shots in his 1st 2 years. he doesn't seem to do that anymore. maybe if detroit started concentrating upon their defense again. imo a lotta the players on the 2nd team should be 1st IF they weren't injury-prone; marcus camby and tim duncan come to mind. i'm still kinda torn about kg being on the defensive team. for some reason, he's not really striking me. maybe that's cause everybody around him sucks.
other ppl who i think should be considered, but maybe aren't because the ppl ahead of them are too good:
alonzo mourning - i dislike the heat except for 2 players; one of them is dwyane wade, the other is this guy. for a guy who comes off the bench and is getting old, his defense never ceases to amaze me. his defense is leagues above everybody else's on the heat, simply because his actually shows up night in and night out. (posey isn't bad btw, and wade's is improving though he's not quite there yet)
gerald wallace - stat-wise a lot like ak
rasheed wallace - sam actually believes rasheed is the best 1-on-1 post defender in the nba right now.
elton brand
shaun marion
there's probably more...
one last thing regarding bowen vs wallace:
i'm sure you probably know this, but bruce bowen is a TREMENDOUS defender; he guards ppl his size, but also ppl not his size or bulk. however, like i said, i wonder how much of that has to do with what he gets away with when he plays on the court. almost like what the refs are going by on him are ol skool nba defensive rules and everybody else has to abide by new skool nba rules. that being said, i'm still amazed; this guy can guard dirk. that's unreal. centers can't guard dirk, guys outta proportion can't guard dirk. tayshaun's my favorite perimeter defender in this day and age obviously, but he wasn't able to guard tim duncan when larry went small last year in the finals. for the number of guys that bruce guards that are out of proportion, it's unreal. that's imo what puts him above ron artest, kobe bryant, tayshaun prince, ak and all the other good perimeter defenders in the nba; good defense isn't about stuffing your stats, but just giving the opponent 1 really bad look without fouling and no chance to rebound. no other perimeter defender does that as well as bowen right now.
ben wallace is probably the best help defender in the nba, no questions asked. man, i wish i had old school clips of bill russell so i could watch this guy wreck and compare him side by side to ben. ben doesn't get assigned to other ppl a lot, but because he has the height of a small forward, but the bulk of a center, he can guard a lotta guys outta proportion to him(or should i more properly say, out of position). combine that with his huge hops and quick feet, and you know what's going to happen on the boards. he isn't necessarily the best 1-on-1 center defender, but you have to realize his height is a mismatch a lotta times. his bulk more than compensates though(fyi, guys w/small height but huge bulk give shaq problems, so you can understand how even ben can be good 1-on-1). basically all his shot swat antics are limited to ppl who are not 5's, b/c if he tried that against centers he would foul out way too fast. but b/c of his speed, you can't beat the pistons by forcing a pick and roll situation, nor get any really open looks when driving in. ben is the original real reason i started liking defense in the nba(yes, i know, i loved the mj bulls, but i never really tried to watch mj and scottie and rodman d it up; now i wished i had)
defensive player of the year:
ben wallace
1st all-defensive nba team:
jason kidd
kobe bryant
bruce bowen
ron artest
andre kirelinko
ben wallace
(there are 6 players on the 1st defensive all-nba team b/c bowen actually TIED with wallace for being on the 1st all nba team; bowen actually had more points selected(55 to 54), but 1 of those points was on the 2nd all-nba defensive team(3 to wallace's 2); take that as what you may)
2nd all-defensive nba team:
chauncey billups
tayshaun prince
kevin garnett
tim duncan
marcus camby
comments:
for the most part, i agree with these ranks. ak's a tremendous defensive player, i love the guy; most deserving of the 1st team. i'm surprised ron's still on the 1st team, but he's really good, perhaps he's just leagues above everybody else on the kings, and most of the games he just presents matchup problems for the others he's guarding. kobe's kobe, can't deny that. jason kidd does everything BUT score, so yeah.
on the 2nd team: i think for chauncey and tayshaun to get into the 1st team, they need to really start tightening up. i get the feeling that tayshaun doesn't seem as dominant as his 1st 2 years on the defensive end; maybe that's cause ppl are getting used to him, but he used to just make ppl miss shots in his 1st 2 years. he doesn't seem to do that anymore. maybe if detroit started concentrating upon their defense again. imo a lotta the players on the 2nd team should be 1st IF they weren't injury-prone; marcus camby and tim duncan come to mind. i'm still kinda torn about kg being on the defensive team. for some reason, he's not really striking me. maybe that's cause everybody around him sucks.
other ppl who i think should be considered, but maybe aren't because the ppl ahead of them are too good:
alonzo mourning - i dislike the heat except for 2 players; one of them is dwyane wade, the other is this guy. for a guy who comes off the bench and is getting old, his defense never ceases to amaze me. his defense is leagues above everybody else's on the heat, simply because his actually shows up night in and night out. (posey isn't bad btw, and wade's is improving though he's not quite there yet)
gerald wallace - stat-wise a lot like ak
rasheed wallace - sam actually believes rasheed is the best 1-on-1 post defender in the nba right now.
elton brand
shaun marion
there's probably more...
one last thing regarding bowen vs wallace:
i'm sure you probably know this, but bruce bowen is a TREMENDOUS defender; he guards ppl his size, but also ppl not his size or bulk. however, like i said, i wonder how much of that has to do with what he gets away with when he plays on the court. almost like what the refs are going by on him are ol skool nba defensive rules and everybody else has to abide by new skool nba rules. that being said, i'm still amazed; this guy can guard dirk. that's unreal. centers can't guard dirk, guys outta proportion can't guard dirk. tayshaun's my favorite perimeter defender in this day and age obviously, but he wasn't able to guard tim duncan when larry went small last year in the finals. for the number of guys that bruce guards that are out of proportion, it's unreal. that's imo what puts him above ron artest, kobe bryant, tayshaun prince, ak and all the other good perimeter defenders in the nba; good defense isn't about stuffing your stats, but just giving the opponent 1 really bad look without fouling and no chance to rebound. no other perimeter defender does that as well as bowen right now.
ben wallace is probably the best help defender in the nba, no questions asked. man, i wish i had old school clips of bill russell so i could watch this guy wreck and compare him side by side to ben. ben doesn't get assigned to other ppl a lot, but because he has the height of a small forward, but the bulk of a center, he can guard a lotta guys outta proportion to him(or should i more properly say, out of position). combine that with his huge hops and quick feet, and you know what's going to happen on the boards. he isn't necessarily the best 1-on-1 center defender, but you have to realize his height is a mismatch a lotta times. his bulk more than compensates though(fyi, guys w/small height but huge bulk give shaq problems, so you can understand how even ben can be good 1-on-1). basically all his shot swat antics are limited to ppl who are not 5's, b/c if he tried that against centers he would foul out way too fast. but b/c of his speed, you can't beat the pistons by forcing a pick and roll situation, nor get any really open looks when driving in. ben is the original real reason i started liking defense in the nba(yes, i know, i loved the mj bulls, but i never really tried to watch mj and scottie and rodman d it up; now i wished i had)
Wednesday, May 10, 2006
rasheed's an interesting case, i'll give you that.
probably very misunderstood.
i think the reason is you THINK he's this troublemaker. with that past history in portland of t's and weed. he's not, although i won't discredit the t's.
he's just very vocal. and even then, not a smartass towards the other team and its other players.
he still gets the t's occasionally just cause he's so emotional on the court and complains to the refs when something doesn't go his way, but you have to realize he's almost like the vocal leader of the pistons, and i believe without him, even if they got the same talents that he has in a trade(excellant 1-on-1 post defender, spot-up 3-pt shooter), his motivational fire of making them always think they're the underdogs is irreplacable; i'd say close to 10-15 of their wins every season is gotten because he's in the locker room, making them think the world is rooting for the other team. and he's a great teammate both in terms of how he plays and how he supports the other guys.
watching last night's cleveland game, although he was never mic'd up, i always heard his yelling picked up over the mics. it was so funny.
doc rivers said it best IMO when he was commentating during the 2k4 finals: "rasheed just wants to win so badly." that's why he's so vocal. you could say that about all the other guys who get technicals, but i can't remember the last time rasheed was in a pistons uniform that he actually got into a fight. granted, the number of fights in the nba has drastically cut down compared to the past, but even the number of minor altercations he's gotten is very few. he had that nasty cut with cleveland's "z," but that was just 1 incident. and he's one of those guys you always see joking on the court, not necessarily to his teammates.
so i have a problem with ppl who think he's bad for this game just because he picks up technicals. kobe bryant was either 2nd or 1st in technicals this year, do you think he's a bad person too(in general; let's leave the grizzlies incident outta this)? what about carmelo anthony? think he's a bad ass cause of those t's as well?
---
btw, what was up w/kobe going soft in game 7? i thought he was way over this in the past in that game vs the kings where he did not take a single shot. it's OK, KOBE; if you're down 20 and time's running out, and kwame and lamar haven't gotten it going, it's OK to go off. seriously, sometimes i think kobe does things that are detrimental to his team in order to prove something about himself at times.
but it's alright; watching how everybody in la suddenly jumped from the lakers to the clippers in the 2nd round is priceless. PRICELESS; WHAT'S A HARDCORE CLIPPERS FAN? never heard of one(except for david)
---
meh.
i seriously wonder how bowen gets away with stuff other defenders don't get away with. i'm not hating on him, but i'm just wondering. are refs really that gullible just because you're holding your hands up? cause what bowen likes to do is hold his hands up. and yet, he's still running into the guy he's defending.
i wonder how many things i learn from watching tim duncan do stuff offensively in the low post. cause it's a fairly long list. screening to switch to a smaller defender, then posting up, trying to go inside, and only using baseline if you fake inside, using a linear floater. using your arms to brush away the opponent's arms to get into position.
probably very misunderstood.
i think the reason is you THINK he's this troublemaker. with that past history in portland of t's and weed. he's not, although i won't discredit the t's.
he's just very vocal. and even then, not a smartass towards the other team and its other players.
he still gets the t's occasionally just cause he's so emotional on the court and complains to the refs when something doesn't go his way, but you have to realize he's almost like the vocal leader of the pistons, and i believe without him, even if they got the same talents that he has in a trade(excellant 1-on-1 post defender, spot-up 3-pt shooter), his motivational fire of making them always think they're the underdogs is irreplacable; i'd say close to 10-15 of their wins every season is gotten because he's in the locker room, making them think the world is rooting for the other team. and he's a great teammate both in terms of how he plays and how he supports the other guys.
watching last night's cleveland game, although he was never mic'd up, i always heard his yelling picked up over the mics. it was so funny.
doc rivers said it best IMO when he was commentating during the 2k4 finals: "rasheed just wants to win so badly." that's why he's so vocal. you could say that about all the other guys who get technicals, but i can't remember the last time rasheed was in a pistons uniform that he actually got into a fight. granted, the number of fights in the nba has drastically cut down compared to the past, but even the number of minor altercations he's gotten is very few. he had that nasty cut with cleveland's "z," but that was just 1 incident. and he's one of those guys you always see joking on the court, not necessarily to his teammates.
so i have a problem with ppl who think he's bad for this game just because he picks up technicals. kobe bryant was either 2nd or 1st in technicals this year, do you think he's a bad person too(in general; let's leave the grizzlies incident outta this)? what about carmelo anthony? think he's a bad ass cause of those t's as well?
---
btw, what was up w/kobe going soft in game 7? i thought he was way over this in the past in that game vs the kings where he did not take a single shot. it's OK, KOBE; if you're down 20 and time's running out, and kwame and lamar haven't gotten it going, it's OK to go off. seriously, sometimes i think kobe does things that are detrimental to his team in order to prove something about himself at times.
but it's alright; watching how everybody in la suddenly jumped from the lakers to the clippers in the 2nd round is priceless. PRICELESS; WHAT'S A HARDCORE CLIPPERS FAN? never heard of one(except for david)
---
meh.
i seriously wonder how bowen gets away with stuff other defenders don't get away with. i'm not hating on him, but i'm just wondering. are refs really that gullible just because you're holding your hands up? cause what bowen likes to do is hold his hands up. and yet, he's still running into the guy he's defending.
i wonder how many things i learn from watching tim duncan do stuff offensively in the low post. cause it's a fairly long list. screening to switch to a smaller defender, then posting up, trying to go inside, and only using baseline if you fake inside, using a linear floater. using your arms to brush away the opponent's arms to get into position.
Monday, May 08, 2006
detroit...
looked...
disgusting...
it seriously looked like game 4 vs the spurs during the finals last season when they lit it up... lindsey hunter isn't supposed to connect all those 3s without any screens... tayshaun isn't supposed to go 4 for 4 beyond the arc... and detroit doesn't shoot 92% from the arc even when they're on fire... but it happened...
i was loving it...
looked...
disgusting...
it seriously looked like game 4 vs the spurs during the finals last season when they lit it up... lindsey hunter isn't supposed to connect all those 3s without any screens... tayshaun isn't supposed to go 4 for 4 beyond the arc... and detroit doesn't shoot 92% from the arc even when they're on fire... but it happened...
i was loving it...
Saturday, May 06, 2006
Queer Plans For the Straight Man
This must be the japanese version of Queer Eye for the Straight Guy... however, it's a LOT funnier...
Har-do Gay Foooooooo!
This must be the japanese version of Queer Eye for the Straight Guy... however, it's a LOT funnier...
Har-do Gay Foooooooo!
Friday, May 05, 2006
something i'm paraphrasing out of the book i'm reading, but should give you something to think about...
in order for God to communicate his word to his people, he had to put his word in the common language. now, note that some groups are going to just be excluded because of that, but you would just have to learn the new language. is this unfair to other nations? perhaps... but we should never question God's will; i believe that in the end, the very words that jesus spoke about losing none of those that were given to him from the Father holds true.
so...
old testament - hebrew language is the common language.
new testament - greek language(God didn't even return back to jersualem to use it to further his kingdom; the new center of christianity was in antioch, syria, as established in acts)
combination of the 2 together to form the bible - english language. God did not choose any other european country powerhouses because they were tainted with rome(ie the pope had some influence there), and hence had roman catholic influences. that excluded spain, france, germany, italy. england had a history of being catholic, true, but it also had a long, and permanent history after that of rebellion against rome(look up when rome used spain as a pawn tried to attack them navally and failed), and remained prostant. the us was also established upon christian(specifically protestant) men and women.
that's basically the gist of what i was going to say; i'm not looking at my book as i'm writing this, so i'm sure i'm excluding some words, but this should be good enough for you to mull over for a bit.
btw, the book i'm reading is:
samuel c. gipp - an understandable history of the bible
(one more note: what we consider "old english" and "middle english" is actually a LOT more old than the english in the kjv; if you were to look at actual "old english," there'd be NO WAY you could read it AT ALL. so, the excuse that kjv is old english does not hold up)
in order for God to communicate his word to his people, he had to put his word in the common language. now, note that some groups are going to just be excluded because of that, but you would just have to learn the new language. is this unfair to other nations? perhaps... but we should never question God's will; i believe that in the end, the very words that jesus spoke about losing none of those that were given to him from the Father holds true.
so...
old testament - hebrew language is the common language.
new testament - greek language(God didn't even return back to jersualem to use it to further his kingdom; the new center of christianity was in antioch, syria, as established in acts)
combination of the 2 together to form the bible - english language. God did not choose any other european country powerhouses because they were tainted with rome(ie the pope had some influence there), and hence had roman catholic influences. that excluded spain, france, germany, italy. england had a history of being catholic, true, but it also had a long, and permanent history after that of rebellion against rome(look up when rome used spain as a pawn tried to attack them navally and failed), and remained prostant. the us was also established upon christian(specifically protestant) men and women.
that's basically the gist of what i was going to say; i'm not looking at my book as i'm writing this, so i'm sure i'm excluding some words, but this should be good enough for you to mull over for a bit.
btw, the book i'm reading is:
samuel c. gipp - an understandable history of the bible
(one more note: what we consider "old english" and "middle english" is actually a LOT more old than the english in the kjv; if you were to look at actual "old english," there'd be NO WAY you could read it AT ALL. so, the excuse that kjv is old english does not hold up)
Tuesday, May 02, 2006
"duh" statement of the night regarding bball from me:
if you're having trouble playing defense against somebody, try making them play defense a bit more.
it sounds stupid at first, and kinda obvious, and nba players do say it all the time in press conferences, but the more i thought about it, the more it's meaning has hit upon me.
you see, sometimes you're going up against a good scorer, and it seems that no matter what you do, you can't contain him.
well, assuming he's the one guarding you on the other end, one of the ways you can wear him out is to start trying to score more on him, make him chase you around screens more, etc. that may help wear him out, and make your defense a bit easier; it won't solve the entire puzzle, you still have to play good defense, but it may help you out some.
so even if you are unselfish and don't want to see yourself as the main scorer of your team, just learning some simple effective stuff to throw at your opponent when you're on the offensive end if you're coming up puzzled about how to stop your opponent's offense will help a lot.
it's kinda hit me this late, b/c i don't consider myself the main scorer on any team i play when i'm playing bball. part of that does have to do with my abilities. but if i'm playing against people i don't know, chances are that i might end up guarding someone who is very aggressive and demanding of the ball. in cases like those, it might be good to play a bit more offense on him, in the motive of trying to wear him down more.
---
fyi, i really thought(and hoped) chicago should've won game 5. no real excuses they shouldn't have. but dwyane wade's will to win should in all due respects be commended. fought through an incredibly painful injury knowing the offense on the heat depended upon him. and it seemed that when the heat saw him come back, their confidence and will to win came back. they went on a defensive rout(although, knowing chicago's not that great offensively, i want to say it's more that chicago struggled rather than heat locked them down.) it's just a shame that this will probably hurt them down the road; even if they beat the bulls and move on, you could say this puts the nail in the hopes that the heat will make it to the finals yet again. i don't think you even need detroit to knock the heat out of the eastern race. the nets can do it. i want to say indiana could do it as well, but that's stretching it. however, i do think indiana can take this weakened heat team to 7 games.
---
you said it, ron, now make your promise. (just looking to see if "infinite intensity" 93 is going to step up and fulfill his promise of the kings getting into the 2nd round, or were those just empty threats to the league.)
---
this world is so full of people making the most stupidest comments out of ignorance. they just say whatever they want without any thought to it. that's probably what boils me so much. i'm all for free speech and it's great to live in a country that supports it; you should never be afraid of saying something because you know someone's not going to like what you said. but i am also for saying SOUND SPEECH, because free speech is IMO not a ticket to saying ANYTHING, but more like a ticket to saying WHAT IS RIGHT REGARDLESS OF WHETHER PEOPLE AGREE WITH YOU OR NOT. in other countries, you can get arrested, tortured, even killed for saying stuff, even if it is right. here you cannot. i do not believe the founding fathers of this nation allowed free speech so idiots can say the stupidest things. they allowed it so that the balance of power in speech would never be tipped into the hands of the person with the most military and monetary resources. think about that for more than a few seconds before you start saying something really stupid on impulse the next time.
in like vein of the same subject, sometimes i argue with myself regarding christianity like this:
+: it's simply not right for me to hate upon another person just because they have the most ignorant thoughts. that does not make myself any better. that's wrong.
-: i conceed with that, and know it. but does that make what they thought ok? am i supposed to just tolerate what they said? it's still wrong regardless.
...
so then, how am i supposed to loathe their thoughts, but not them? especially when it seems like the way they act and think DEFINES them?
+: but do you think your hating on them will ever change their actions and their thinking?
-: maybe... without a clear sense of what is right and wrong and why, i don't think i would ever get to a point where i disliked something about them in the first place. but you are right that if i never confront them directly in love, they have a much lower chance of changing the way they think.
THAT is probably why it is so tough to "hate the sin, not the sinner." because we can only define a person based upon their looks, their method of thinking, and the way they act. we keep saying love unconditionally, but in order to overlook all those things and simply love them(remember that unconditional love would mean we also don't necessarily love them just for the things that we see good in them), would be no different, then say, trying to love any living organism unconditionally.
although, i think in the end values and personality both help. values, will define how much you think what they're doing is not ok. personality, will determine angry or understanding you'll be. although, we do know what is impossible with men is possible with God.
if you're having trouble playing defense against somebody, try making them play defense a bit more.
it sounds stupid at first, and kinda obvious, and nba players do say it all the time in press conferences, but the more i thought about it, the more it's meaning has hit upon me.
you see, sometimes you're going up against a good scorer, and it seems that no matter what you do, you can't contain him.
well, assuming he's the one guarding you on the other end, one of the ways you can wear him out is to start trying to score more on him, make him chase you around screens more, etc. that may help wear him out, and make your defense a bit easier; it won't solve the entire puzzle, you still have to play good defense, but it may help you out some.
so even if you are unselfish and don't want to see yourself as the main scorer of your team, just learning some simple effective stuff to throw at your opponent when you're on the offensive end if you're coming up puzzled about how to stop your opponent's offense will help a lot.
it's kinda hit me this late, b/c i don't consider myself the main scorer on any team i play when i'm playing bball. part of that does have to do with my abilities. but if i'm playing against people i don't know, chances are that i might end up guarding someone who is very aggressive and demanding of the ball. in cases like those, it might be good to play a bit more offense on him, in the motive of trying to wear him down more.
---
fyi, i really thought(and hoped) chicago should've won game 5. no real excuses they shouldn't have. but dwyane wade's will to win should in all due respects be commended. fought through an incredibly painful injury knowing the offense on the heat depended upon him. and it seemed that when the heat saw him come back, their confidence and will to win came back. they went on a defensive rout(although, knowing chicago's not that great offensively, i want to say it's more that chicago struggled rather than heat locked them down.) it's just a shame that this will probably hurt them down the road; even if they beat the bulls and move on, you could say this puts the nail in the hopes that the heat will make it to the finals yet again. i don't think you even need detroit to knock the heat out of the eastern race. the nets can do it. i want to say indiana could do it as well, but that's stretching it. however, i do think indiana can take this weakened heat team to 7 games.
---
you said it, ron, now make your promise. (just looking to see if "infinite intensity" 93 is going to step up and fulfill his promise of the kings getting into the 2nd round, or were those just empty threats to the league.)
---
this world is so full of people making the most stupidest comments out of ignorance. they just say whatever they want without any thought to it. that's probably what boils me so much. i'm all for free speech and it's great to live in a country that supports it; you should never be afraid of saying something because you know someone's not going to like what you said. but i am also for saying SOUND SPEECH, because free speech is IMO not a ticket to saying ANYTHING, but more like a ticket to saying WHAT IS RIGHT REGARDLESS OF WHETHER PEOPLE AGREE WITH YOU OR NOT. in other countries, you can get arrested, tortured, even killed for saying stuff, even if it is right. here you cannot. i do not believe the founding fathers of this nation allowed free speech so idiots can say the stupidest things. they allowed it so that the balance of power in speech would never be tipped into the hands of the person with the most military and monetary resources. think about that for more than a few seconds before you start saying something really stupid on impulse the next time.
in like vein of the same subject, sometimes i argue with myself regarding christianity like this:
+: it's simply not right for me to hate upon another person just because they have the most ignorant thoughts. that does not make myself any better. that's wrong.
-: i conceed with that, and know it. but does that make what they thought ok? am i supposed to just tolerate what they said? it's still wrong regardless.
...
so then, how am i supposed to loathe their thoughts, but not them? especially when it seems like the way they act and think DEFINES them?
+: but do you think your hating on them will ever change their actions and their thinking?
-: maybe... without a clear sense of what is right and wrong and why, i don't think i would ever get to a point where i disliked something about them in the first place. but you are right that if i never confront them directly in love, they have a much lower chance of changing the way they think.
THAT is probably why it is so tough to "hate the sin, not the sinner." because we can only define a person based upon their looks, their method of thinking, and the way they act. we keep saying love unconditionally, but in order to overlook all those things and simply love them(remember that unconditional love would mean we also don't necessarily love them just for the things that we see good in them), would be no different, then say, trying to love any living organism unconditionally.
although, i think in the end values and personality both help. values, will define how much you think what they're doing is not ok. personality, will determine angry or understanding you'll be. although, we do know what is impossible with men is possible with God.
if the kings announcers weren't so stupid, i might actually like the kings a lot more...
bonzi and artest are players that contribute power to the kings on both ends... something the kings have never really been in the past.
i wonder how much of what bob said is true though; duncan really does not look like the low post monster of the past year. when he bangs, then spins and puts up a low floater, he's never right up on the basket as of late. without him light on his feet on both offense and defense, you turn spurs into a guard-oriented team(they always were, but in the past, when they got into trouble, they could always throw the ball inside to duncan and instantly solve the problem). and artest HAS been containing ginobili. so now from the spurs' perspective, the bulk of your shot-creation comes from parker, who is trying to become great in the postseason, something he hasn't really gotten down yet.
granted, he has an injury in his leg, but i think ppl forget the same year the pistons won the championship, rip played through a broken nose and rasheed played through an injured foot(game 4 brilliance vs lakers anybody?).
---
other nba playoff thoughts...
i still love chicago... they have a great chance to upset miami. they're like a poor man's detroit; nothing fancy, just hard defense and efficient offense(and no, i don't consider that boring; you know that already). i really believe chicago is just 1 good post player away from becoming one of the top 3 teams in the east(so either get a good draft pick, or tyson gets JUST A FRIKKIN JUMPSHOT and continues to develop his good d). and they have the #1 draft pick thanks to ny. if they pick up tyrus thomas, and he turns into something, the rest of the eastern conference better seriously watch out.
---
indiana... refuses... to... die...
kinda like chicago...
just incredible...
i continue to like indiana despite reggie miller gone, unlike most of the other non-native indiana fans i know. j.o. was sick in game 3. 80%?
---
funny how la is on the verge of having both their teams face each other... but la's always been about flashiness... no doubt most of them will root for the lakers... i hope elton brand and chris kaman do david suh a nice favor and kick the lakers' asses.
---
that's about all i can think of.
---
ok, some other stuff coming to my mind...
i need another cd case to house my cds... i've been a dl-and-burn freak ever since i got 2 512 mb usb's and realized the cpu labs at uc davis have cd-rw hard drives. i'd say about 60 cds... but it's slowing down... i'm mainly trying to get rid of all the stuff on my desktop. and stuff i wanted to put on a cd, like emulators, roms, mods to games i have, videos of various fighting games... once i've put everything on a cd, i can defragment my laptop, and then it can run a lot faster.
i like having stuff on cd's for data as opposed to buying another hard drive(usb's aside), b/c then i still HAVE the stuff, but if i want to use it, i'll have to go through the trouble of looking through the cds until i pick out what i want. in that way, i can keep myself from being too much of a slacker, b/c i'll have to put some effort into finding what i want.
---
still reading gipp's book concerning the bible. it's really great. i doubt i'll finish it by end of spring quarter, but i'm still going to buy a couple more books concerning the bible before i'm done; i'd like to have 6 b4 i graduate.
oh, and maybe sun tzu's "art of war." always wanted to own that book.
---
i should brush up on my lead guitar skills sometime on wednesday... i'm planning on actually going over to zane and moises' apt on thursday, since i've always said i would, but never would.
bonzi and artest are players that contribute power to the kings on both ends... something the kings have never really been in the past.
i wonder how much of what bob said is true though; duncan really does not look like the low post monster of the past year. when he bangs, then spins and puts up a low floater, he's never right up on the basket as of late. without him light on his feet on both offense and defense, you turn spurs into a guard-oriented team(they always were, but in the past, when they got into trouble, they could always throw the ball inside to duncan and instantly solve the problem). and artest HAS been containing ginobili. so now from the spurs' perspective, the bulk of your shot-creation comes from parker, who is trying to become great in the postseason, something he hasn't really gotten down yet.
granted, he has an injury in his leg, but i think ppl forget the same year the pistons won the championship, rip played through a broken nose and rasheed played through an injured foot(game 4 brilliance vs lakers anybody?).
---
other nba playoff thoughts...
i still love chicago... they have a great chance to upset miami. they're like a poor man's detroit; nothing fancy, just hard defense and efficient offense(and no, i don't consider that boring; you know that already). i really believe chicago is just 1 good post player away from becoming one of the top 3 teams in the east(so either get a good draft pick, or tyson gets JUST A FRIKKIN JUMPSHOT and continues to develop his good d). and they have the #1 draft pick thanks to ny. if they pick up tyrus thomas, and he turns into something, the rest of the eastern conference better seriously watch out.
---
indiana... refuses... to... die...
kinda like chicago...
just incredible...
i continue to like indiana despite reggie miller gone, unlike most of the other non-native indiana fans i know. j.o. was sick in game 3. 80%?
---
funny how la is on the verge of having both their teams face each other... but la's always been about flashiness... no doubt most of them will root for the lakers... i hope elton brand and chris kaman do david suh a nice favor and kick the lakers' asses.
---
that's about all i can think of.
---
ok, some other stuff coming to my mind...
i need another cd case to house my cds... i've been a dl-and-burn freak ever since i got 2 512 mb usb's and realized the cpu labs at uc davis have cd-rw hard drives. i'd say about 60 cds... but it's slowing down... i'm mainly trying to get rid of all the stuff on my desktop. and stuff i wanted to put on a cd, like emulators, roms, mods to games i have, videos of various fighting games... once i've put everything on a cd, i can defragment my laptop, and then it can run a lot faster.
i like having stuff on cd's for data as opposed to buying another hard drive(usb's aside), b/c then i still HAVE the stuff, but if i want to use it, i'll have to go through the trouble of looking through the cds until i pick out what i want. in that way, i can keep myself from being too much of a slacker, b/c i'll have to put some effort into finding what i want.
---
still reading gipp's book concerning the bible. it's really great. i doubt i'll finish it by end of spring quarter, but i'm still going to buy a couple more books concerning the bible before i'm done; i'd like to have 6 b4 i graduate.
oh, and maybe sun tzu's "art of war." always wanted to own that book.
---
i should brush up on my lead guitar skills sometime on wednesday... i'm planning on actually going over to zane and moises' apt on thursday, since i've always said i would, but never would.
Monday, May 01, 2006
Thursday, April 27, 2006
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
i still can't believe steve's going to korea and not coming back til july.
anyways, we had a goodbye dinner for him today.
not really a guys things to do, but we all ordered desert just for the heck of it.
and it hit me...
now i understand why girls always order desert at a restaurant and guys never do.
it has something to do with why girls always eat so little.
i think you get the idea, but i'll add that girls always seem to have a sweet tooth more than guys. guys don't NEED a cheesecake after dinner to feel like the meal was a success, if the main course itself was good enough.
anyways, we had a goodbye dinner for him today.
not really a guys things to do, but we all ordered desert just for the heck of it.
and it hit me...
now i understand why girls always order desert at a restaurant and guys never do.
it has something to do with why girls always eat so little.
i think you get the idea, but i'll add that girls always seem to have a sweet tooth more than guys. guys don't NEED a cheesecake after dinner to feel like the meal was a success, if the main course itself was good enough.
Monday, April 24, 2006
French may not be THE most useless language ever, but here's some reasons a lotta ppl feel that way:
outside of France, and maybe parts of Canada, not many people need speak it out of necessity. ever needed French to get by any particular area in the melting pot known as the US?
there's still a lotta people from France around these days(hence, the amount of people who exist from France and need to speak it to survive these days vs the amount of people in the world who don't use it is slanted compared to some scant native american tribe)
it just sounds "gay." maybe that's cause the typical french accent often revolves around pursing your lips and using oo's, u's, and upward accents. i THINK that's the reason it sounds kinda "gay."
so there you have it; main reasons i think why some ppl think french is a useless language; lotsa ppl from france, not a lotta places where you need to speak it, and it just sounding REALLY weird = useless.
---
"TRUE truth" can only be seen once you take a non-biased, comprehensive analysis of the subject you are trying to study. until you do so, it may only be "biased opinion." otherwise known as ignorance. that's not to say all truths are non-biased. but "TRUE truth" looks at both sides, all angles and says "i know about these arguments, and understand why they're put up, but after close analysis, these counterarguments are stronger."
---
James 4:3 is powerful. just read it, and see if it isn't the most telling reason why we're not asking God in prayer for the right reasons:
3Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts.
the more i ponder upon this verse, the more it becomes imprinted upon my mind. it's simple to remember and quite profound. b/c i have not found any other verse in the bible which explains WHY God doesn't answer every single of our requests the way we want him to.
you know what are the 3 things of the world: lust of the eye, lust of the flesh, and the pride of life. that's what the "lusts." in the verse refer to, do they not?
outside of France, and maybe parts of Canada, not many people need speak it out of necessity. ever needed French to get by any particular area in the melting pot known as the US?
there's still a lotta people from France around these days(hence, the amount of people who exist from France and need to speak it to survive these days vs the amount of people in the world who don't use it is slanted compared to some scant native american tribe)
it just sounds "gay." maybe that's cause the typical french accent often revolves around pursing your lips and using oo's, u's, and upward accents. i THINK that's the reason it sounds kinda "gay."
so there you have it; main reasons i think why some ppl think french is a useless language; lotsa ppl from france, not a lotta places where you need to speak it, and it just sounding REALLY weird = useless.
---
"TRUE truth" can only be seen once you take a non-biased, comprehensive analysis of the subject you are trying to study. until you do so, it may only be "biased opinion." otherwise known as ignorance. that's not to say all truths are non-biased. but "TRUE truth" looks at both sides, all angles and says "i know about these arguments, and understand why they're put up, but after close analysis, these counterarguments are stronger."
---
James 4:3 is powerful. just read it, and see if it isn't the most telling reason why we're not asking God in prayer for the right reasons:
3Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts.
the more i ponder upon this verse, the more it becomes imprinted upon my mind. it's simple to remember and quite profound. b/c i have not found any other verse in the bible which explains WHY God doesn't answer every single of our requests the way we want him to.
you know what are the 3 things of the world: lust of the eye, lust of the flesh, and the pride of life. that's what the "lusts." in the verse refer to, do they not?
Saturday, April 22, 2006
scary movie 4 wasn't THAT great... funny, but wasn't THAT great. it's weird, cause all the commercials hyped up the whole dr. phil and shaq thing, and they end up using all those jokes in the 1st 10 min or so. the movie's overall very funny, but it seemed to lose its edge from when the series 1st started, and ykno, the wayan brothers were involved(the movies done by them were rated R, not pg-13).
then again, you go to this type of movie not to watch for substance, but just to laugh.
we had a choice between watching scary movie 4 and american dreams for tonight. i think we all wanted to watch american dreams more, but we have to be by church by SIX AM(yes, that's right) for tomorrow for picnic day. unreal. and this type of movie is usually very short.
anyways, i bet a lotta 24 freaks want to watch The Sentinel.
and i bet flight 93's going to be very good.
but i'm not a movies guy, so chances are i'm either going to watch it on dvd, or do the opposite, but more common thing, which is end up forgetting it altogether.
then again, you go to this type of movie not to watch for substance, but just to laugh.
we had a choice between watching scary movie 4 and american dreams for tonight. i think we all wanted to watch american dreams more, but we have to be by church by SIX AM(yes, that's right) for tomorrow for picnic day. unreal. and this type of movie is usually very short.
anyways, i bet a lotta 24 freaks want to watch The Sentinel.
and i bet flight 93's going to be very good.
but i'm not a movies guy, so chances are i'm either going to watch it on dvd, or do the opposite, but more common thing, which is end up forgetting it altogether.
Friday, April 21, 2006
for those of you who want to dl from youtube
if pistons get anything other than a championship after this year, i think they'll consider this season a failure. and why not. besides having home court all postseason, their flawless starting 5 has been healthy all year, their bench is better than last year, miami 2k6 seems like a watered down version compared to last year, spurs' timmah has not been as quick as last year, and mavs if they do make it will be so tired from facing the spurs.
they just have to not beat themselves up getting there or underestimate the darkhorses in the east.
ykno, the year that the pistons won the championship, they completely changed how most bball organizations viewed trying to build a team, for the better. i think if they win this year, they'll completely change how some organizations try to approach the regular season. b/c while everybody was taking it easy, pistons came out hot right from the get go, and piled up a TON of easy wins. if it comes down to game 7 vs spurs and the pistons DO win thanks to their raucous home crowd, i think it may change a couple of things again. ppl may actually try to play hard before the all-star break.
if pistons get anything other than a championship after this year, i think they'll consider this season a failure. and why not. besides having home court all postseason, their flawless starting 5 has been healthy all year, their bench is better than last year, miami 2k6 seems like a watered down version compared to last year, spurs' timmah has not been as quick as last year, and mavs if they do make it will be so tired from facing the spurs.
they just have to not beat themselves up getting there or underestimate the darkhorses in the east.
ykno, the year that the pistons won the championship, they completely changed how most bball organizations viewed trying to build a team, for the better. i think if they win this year, they'll completely change how some organizations try to approach the regular season. b/c while everybody was taking it easy, pistons came out hot right from the get go, and piled up a TON of easy wins. if it comes down to game 7 vs spurs and the pistons DO win thanks to their raucous home crowd, i think it may change a couple of things again. ppl may actually try to play hard before the all-star break.
Thursday, April 20, 2006
man, i just do NOT feel like doing work today... what is wrong w/me... i am seriously going to pry myself off this cpu at the cpu lab when i'm done and just go home and cook some dinner; maybe i'll feel a bit better then.
---
i now have the official "uc davis cowtipping team" t-shirt. got it on sale.
cause you know how i like playing sports, rofl.
fyi, if you did not know, if you actually DO tip a cow over @ucd, you get expelled. no joke. so much about all those high school jokes of smelling manure and tipping cows over at ucd.
and we have fisculated cows @ davis; in the name of science, we have cows which have holes going from the outside into the stomach. no it does not hurt them, and yes they still live. one of the things i would like to do b4 i graduate is stick my hand into a fisculated cow; they allow you to; i've just never found out who to get in contact at the university to do it.
Cow with hole-ie in it
---
struggling over myself over how much man has control over himself vs how much God exerts his will over the world is one of the biggest things that has racked, RACKED my mind as of late. this is really deep if you think about it. i know the Bible states about how there's NO ONE righteous, none have sought after God, and how God predestined us. but then, why would God tell us to work hard? by working hard, does God predestinate us to receive good things? how bout the mindset to work hard; was that predestinated by God, or originated by our own minds(if you think that just because we thought about working hard, means we chose our own destiny, you're ruling out the possibility of God putting that thought there in the 1st place)? then of course, we have the thing that God will always look after his children regardless of how much they slip up. so if that's predestinated, why work? maybe i'll fall, maybe i'll succeed, but either way God will bring me to what he wants me to do. if God wanted me to become a preacher, would it matter whether I got a 4.0 in genetics courses or not? even if he wanted me to be a geneticist, would it matter again? with God there's always a way. sooo...
not saying you shouldn't work, but this is one of those really tough to answer questions. and i can't say that God doesn't predestinate my life, so i shouldn't work, because that would be contradicting what the Bible said. but yet, we know that not everything in life is going to be given to you on a silver platter, so again, i ask, what's what?
this is one of those questions where i truly don't believe anything i hear from anyone could really satisfy my longing for an answer to this question. i WOULD like God to tell me myself, but i bet if he really tried to tell me the whole specifics and detail, my head might explode from trying to comprehend what he just told me.
---
i now have the official "uc davis cowtipping team" t-shirt. got it on sale.
cause you know how i like playing sports, rofl.
fyi, if you did not know, if you actually DO tip a cow over @ucd, you get expelled. no joke. so much about all those high school jokes of smelling manure and tipping cows over at ucd.
and we have fisculated cows @ davis; in the name of science, we have cows which have holes going from the outside into the stomach. no it does not hurt them, and yes they still live. one of the things i would like to do b4 i graduate is stick my hand into a fisculated cow; they allow you to; i've just never found out who to get in contact at the university to do it.
Cow with hole-ie in it
---
struggling over myself over how much man has control over himself vs how much God exerts his will over the world is one of the biggest things that has racked, RACKED my mind as of late. this is really deep if you think about it. i know the Bible states about how there's NO ONE righteous, none have sought after God, and how God predestined us. but then, why would God tell us to work hard? by working hard, does God predestinate us to receive good things? how bout the mindset to work hard; was that predestinated by God, or originated by our own minds(if you think that just because we thought about working hard, means we chose our own destiny, you're ruling out the possibility of God putting that thought there in the 1st place)? then of course, we have the thing that God will always look after his children regardless of how much they slip up. so if that's predestinated, why work? maybe i'll fall, maybe i'll succeed, but either way God will bring me to what he wants me to do. if God wanted me to become a preacher, would it matter whether I got a 4.0 in genetics courses or not? even if he wanted me to be a geneticist, would it matter again? with God there's always a way. sooo...
not saying you shouldn't work, but this is one of those really tough to answer questions. and i can't say that God doesn't predestinate my life, so i shouldn't work, because that would be contradicting what the Bible said. but yet, we know that not everything in life is going to be given to you on a silver platter, so again, i ask, what's what?
this is one of those questions where i truly don't believe anything i hear from anyone could really satisfy my longing for an answer to this question. i WOULD like God to tell me myself, but i bet if he really tried to tell me the whole specifics and detail, my head might explode from trying to comprehend what he just told me.
strange as this sounds, i STILL don't know how to study well.
yes, i know, i had 3+ years to perfect this art, but i still believe in what i'm saying.
b/c i was getting used to college 1st year and had a loose load(3 classes, took a lotta non-science-related classes), so i got good grades not necessarily b/c i studied well. 2nd year i pretty much blew it off, so nothing gained there. tried the whole tapes thing 3rd year, which was kinda good, but took a LOTTA time, and 4th year i'm trying to actually use the practice problems and tests online, but i still haven't mastered knowing how far ahead a test is and when i should stop slacking around. i've tried other things, but they're kinda minor. and i can simply NOT study at home on my cpu in my room. or with the cpu running in my room. period. it's like a curse, an inevitable curse which i can't avoid.
it's probably one of the most frustrating things i've gone through; never "having enough time" to study.
---
the bible research books i ordered SOOO long time ago should be at my apt in any day now. looking forward to using my weekends a bit more wisely.
---
tmnt:tf for the snes is actually a very good fighting game, competetive-wise. a lot like super turbo. raph is easily the best turtle, top 3 in the game. probably my favorite character in the game due to his very effective rushdown and rediculous ability to keep-away, despite the fact that leo's more or less my favorite ninja turtle(he's probably one of the worst characters in this game).
-spam his jamboree projectile; it's rediculously fast in recovery. decent startup too. that stuff will cover so much of the screen it will make him look like o.sagat. abuse it if you corner-trap the opponent. if you're doing this out of charging down/back for the chest buster, tap forward before you do it, or you'll do power drill instead. and if longrange try to keep them coming and mix up the speeds; remember that if they jump...
-use crouching heavy punch as an anti-air; it beats a whole lotta crap from jumpers, or should at least trade.
-backflip's good; it can get him outta lotsa traps.
-standing light kick and standing heavy punch are both very good pokes, as is crouching light kick and crouching light punch; you mainly want to use c.lk up-close, s.hp for midrange beating and c.lp as a counter-poke and s.lk for about the same reasons as c.lp. jumping heavy kick is your best crossup.
-chest buster's rediculously good as long as you don't get it blocked up-close; opponent can usually get a free combo or throw you. c.lk x4, cancel into light kick-chest buster should leave you safe, and allow you to continue pressure. it can be used to get closer through projectiles, or you can try to bait the opponent by whiffing it so you land just short of the opponent. fyi, optional cross-up heavy kick into c.lk x4, cancel into heavy kick-chest buster is your main combo. that combo leaves your opponent almost dizzy.
-and of course, he can do ol skool m.bison cheese with his long range-blocked power drill into throw. but i never use that exclusively, mainly not b/c it's ineffective, but rather boring; besides, all his other tools are way too good enough.
-his super's not that great, but since he builds up meter so fast, you will end up using it quite a bit; it's not bad, but usually you'll only be able to use it for block damage. do it after you knock the opponent down.
i wish i had kept a hard copy of the cached page of the forum detailing how to play this game; now i only have the 1st page of the forum(cached) which broke the game down way deep. so i basically only know how to play the top tiers hah. which are btw, raph, chrome dome(this guy's dhalsim and gief), and arm(the shark)(bs flash kick anti-air). aska and shredder and upper-mid i believe though. supers couldn't be combo'd into, but i believe mike's super was unblockable; that automatically gave him the best super; aska's is also up there. war had the best pokes, but still is the worst character in the game. that leaves the two other turtles hovering around "mid," with don ahead of leo. i forget who, but i remember don being able to beat one character pretty badly. maybe aska. and ratking and kurai should be banned from any competitive tournament. you could do cps1 chains in this game, but only 1 character could actually combo them together.
yes, i know, i had 3+ years to perfect this art, but i still believe in what i'm saying.
b/c i was getting used to college 1st year and had a loose load(3 classes, took a lotta non-science-related classes), so i got good grades not necessarily b/c i studied well. 2nd year i pretty much blew it off, so nothing gained there. tried the whole tapes thing 3rd year, which was kinda good, but took a LOTTA time, and 4th year i'm trying to actually use the practice problems and tests online, but i still haven't mastered knowing how far ahead a test is and when i should stop slacking around. i've tried other things, but they're kinda minor. and i can simply NOT study at home on my cpu in my room. or with the cpu running in my room. period. it's like a curse, an inevitable curse which i can't avoid.
it's probably one of the most frustrating things i've gone through; never "having enough time" to study.
---
the bible research books i ordered SOOO long time ago should be at my apt in any day now. looking forward to using my weekends a bit more wisely.
---
tmnt:tf for the snes is actually a very good fighting game, competetive-wise. a lot like super turbo. raph is easily the best turtle, top 3 in the game. probably my favorite character in the game due to his very effective rushdown and rediculous ability to keep-away, despite the fact that leo's more or less my favorite ninja turtle(he's probably one of the worst characters in this game).
-spam his jamboree projectile; it's rediculously fast in recovery. decent startup too. that stuff will cover so much of the screen it will make him look like o.sagat. abuse it if you corner-trap the opponent. if you're doing this out of charging down/back for the chest buster, tap forward before you do it, or you'll do power drill instead. and if longrange try to keep them coming and mix up the speeds; remember that if they jump...
-use crouching heavy punch as an anti-air; it beats a whole lotta crap from jumpers, or should at least trade.
-backflip's good; it can get him outta lotsa traps.
-standing light kick and standing heavy punch are both very good pokes, as is crouching light kick and crouching light punch; you mainly want to use c.lk up-close, s.hp for midrange beating and c.lp as a counter-poke and s.lk for about the same reasons as c.lp. jumping heavy kick is your best crossup.
-chest buster's rediculously good as long as you don't get it blocked up-close; opponent can usually get a free combo or throw you. c.lk x4, cancel into light kick-chest buster should leave you safe, and allow you to continue pressure. it can be used to get closer through projectiles, or you can try to bait the opponent by whiffing it so you land just short of the opponent. fyi, optional cross-up heavy kick into c.lk x4, cancel into heavy kick-chest buster is your main combo. that combo leaves your opponent almost dizzy.
-and of course, he can do ol skool m.bison cheese with his long range-blocked power drill into throw. but i never use that exclusively, mainly not b/c it's ineffective, but rather boring; besides, all his other tools are way too good enough.
-his super's not that great, but since he builds up meter so fast, you will end up using it quite a bit; it's not bad, but usually you'll only be able to use it for block damage. do it after you knock the opponent down.
i wish i had kept a hard copy of the cached page of the forum detailing how to play this game; now i only have the 1st page of the forum(cached) which broke the game down way deep. so i basically only know how to play the top tiers hah. which are btw, raph, chrome dome(this guy's dhalsim and gief), and arm(the shark)(bs flash kick anti-air). aska and shredder and upper-mid i believe though. supers couldn't be combo'd into, but i believe mike's super was unblockable; that automatically gave him the best super; aska's is also up there. war had the best pokes, but still is the worst character in the game. that leaves the two other turtles hovering around "mid," with don ahead of leo. i forget who, but i remember don being able to beat one character pretty badly. maybe aska. and ratking and kurai should be banned from any competitive tournament. you could do cps1 chains in this game, but only 1 character could actually combo them together.
Tuesday, April 18, 2006
Saturday, April 15, 2006
it's only fair i repost the entry i made a while back, since easter sunday's around the corner;
despite the fact that i get close to 0 traffic at my diary, sometimes i make a conscious effort to hold back posting(despite the fact that things keep happening in life) when i posted what i consider a very deep post; i know not everybody reads every single new post i make, but maybe those that do just read the top post, so i'm hoping ppl at least read this huge bulk of text when i do, IF they do
have a great day celebrating christ's day of resurrection, ppls; ok onto the reposted entry:
from thursday, october 27, 2005:
What day did Christ die, and what day did he rise again?
It is quite interesting to see how easily people come to believe something they are told within the church without researching things for themselves.
Common belief amongst Christians is that roughly 2000 years ago(more like 1970 or so years), Jesus died on a Friday morning during Passover, and then arose on Sunday morning.
What I wrote below, I basically read from somewhere off the web, and the 1st time I read it, I was shocked. But I sat down, thought about it, diagramed it, and realized it must be true. It all makes sense.
Now, what I’m about to say seems to be pretty controversial, but I encourage you to not debate this by questioning how skewed my ideas are from common belief, but by countering my arguments from the bible itself; I believe that the Bible is the absolute truth from God’s mouth, and that God can’t lie. If you think I’m wrong, show me in the Bible where I’m wrong.
First of all, why what we believe is wrong:
Jesus stated that he would remain dead for 3 full days; that’s 3 days and 3 nights; read the following passage:
Matthew 12:40
That means Jesus could not have died on the supposedly Good Friday and risen on Easter Sunday; if he died on Friday morning, that would mean to fulfill the biblical prophecy, he would have to arise on Monday night(he would have spent Friday night, all of Saturday and Sunday, and Monday morning dead in order to fulfill the prophecy). If he died on Friday night, then he would have to arisen on Tuesday morning. Likewise, if he arose on Sunday morning, he would have died on Wednesday night(all of Thursday, Friday and Saturday spent dead), and if he arose on Sunday night, that would mean he would have had to died on Thursday morning. There are only 1 and a half days that exist between Friday morning and Sunday morning; Friday night and all of Saturday.
Time to look some verses up:
So then, how can we know what day Jesus actually died and what day he actually arose? The Bible does not in plain English state what day Jesus died, and what day he arose.
However, the Bible DOES infer what day Jesus died, and what day he arose, but you have to put two and two together; it does not state in any single passage when he died and arose.
We do know that Jesus died during the day; perhaps either morning or afternoon. That of course, helps us to know that Jesus must have arisen during the night.
Matthew 27:45-50
We also know Jesus died on the Passover; that’s a fact. Because there’s numerous passages that support this belief.
Matthew 26:2; the Son of Man will be crucified on the feast of the passover
John 13:1; again, the last supper took place during the feast of the Passover; Jesus would later die that night
John 18:39; Pilate offers to release one of the prisoners to the Jews, which means that the day that Jesus was crucified was the Passover
What many people don’t seem to know though, is that there were more than 2 Sabbaths that occurred during the Passover at the time of Jesus’ death; yes; two. People don’t even know that Passover coincides at the same time with another holiday that God commanded his people to observe:
Exodus 12:17-20
So we see that Passover is also known as the Feast of Unleavened Bread and spans from the 14th of the 1st month until the 21st of the same month; that makes for a total of 8 days; count them:
14(1) 15(2) 16(3) 17(4) 18(5) 19(6) 20(7) 21(8)
Leviticus says essentially the same thing, but in another way:
Leviticus 23:4-8
It says that the feast of unleavened bread follows the Passover(which occurs on the 14th) and consists of 7 days; the very 1st day, or the 15th of the 1st month, no work is to be done. The 7th day, or the 21st of the 1st month, no work is to be done. According to the definition of a Sabbath, that would make those Sabbath days.
Leviticus 23:2-3
In addition, remember that the Israelites were still required by God to observe the weekly Sabbath on Saturday during those days. Since a full week is 7 days, and the Feast of Unleavened Bread spans 7 days, That means, the Feast of Unleavened Bread could have 3 Sabbaths, with the weekly Sabbath falling somewhere in between the 2 Sabbaths observed during the feast.
This is why in many passages before Jesus’ death, the Passover is referred to as the Preparation; it was also the preparation day for the feast of unleavened bread.
Mark 15:42-47; the preparation is known as the day before the Sabbath
Luke 22:1-8; the feast of unleavened bread is also known as the Passover, which is the day which Jesus ate with his disciples, then later died
John 19:31; the preparation is the day before the Sabbath(a high day), which is why the Jews wanted to take down the bodies, since they could not do work the next day
John 19:14; it was called the preparation OF the Passover, not preparation FOR the Passover, which means that it had the time during the Passover when one prepares for the feast of unleavened bread
Unfortunately, that still does not enable us to pinpoint the location of the weekly Sabbath during the feast, which would greatly help us know which day Jesus died and rose again.
We do know however, that seemingly a contradiction in the Bible exists after Jesus died; read these two passages.
Luke 23:53 – 24:3
Mark 16:1-6
If only 1 Sabbath existed that week, the women couldn’t possibly buy the spices AFTER they’ve prepared them, and God would be lying. But if 2 Sabbaths existed that week, then the women could buy the spices and then prepared them; they bought them after the 1st Sabbath of the feast, and then prepared them before the weekly Sabbath(Saturday). Then, on the very 1st day of the week in the morning(Sunday), they went to Jesus’ grave, only to find that he had already arisen.
With those facts at hand, we can piece together when Jesus died, and when he arose again.
14th of 1st month - Passover:
-Jesus dies in the daytime; he is taken off of the cross, and buried
-Jesus spends a half day in the tomb; 1 night
15th of 1st month – 1st day of feast of unleavened bread; also the 1st of the 2 of the special Sabbaths observed during that time:
-Jesus spends a full day in the tomb; 1 day and 2 nights have elapsed
-The women rest during that day
16th of 1st month – 2nd day of feast of unleavened bread:
-Women buy and prepare the spices so they can perfume Jesus’ dead body
-Jesus spends a full day in the tomb; 2 days and 3 nights have elapsed
17th of 1st month – 3rd day of feast of unleavened bread:
-Women do not go to tomb; they rest, observing the Sabbath; the feast of unleavened bread spans 7 days, and 7 days have not yet elapsed, so this must be the weekly Sabbath, which would make this day Saturday
-Jesus spends the day in the tomb, but only 1 day, not the night, completing the time he said he would be dead; 3 days and 3 nights, then arises and leaves tomb.
-That means Jesus arose on Saturday night.
18th of 1st month – 4th day of feast of unleavened bread:
-Women go to tomb, only to find that Jesus has arisen
Note that this also makes sense; if Jesus arose on Sunday morning, it is quite plausible that the women who came to the tomb would see Jesus arisING, as opposed to an empty tomb.
So, knowing what day Jesus arose(Saturday night), we can now work backward to Passover(Saturday morning, all of Friday, all of Thursday, Wednesday night), and find out that Jesus died on Wednesday, during the day.
And all this makes sense and coincides with that the Bible states:
Between Wednesday morning, when Jesus died, to Saturday night, when he arose, there are 3 full days; Wednesday night, all of Thursday, all of Friday, and Saturday afternoon. Those 3 days, Jesus spent in the middle of the earth(presumably hell), as he said he would. Amazing eh?
We should be observing Saturday and not Sunday.
(I wanted to add another section stating what Easter really was; during that time, it was a pagan religion, but that’s beyond the scope of this subject, and besides, I don’t have any hard evidence at the time to support this)
Ok, so what am I supposed to do with this information?
Treating weekly Saturdays with more reverence than Sunday’s a good start; I don’t mean to not go to Sunday church and do what you do on Sundays, but inward, have more respect for Saturdays and what you do during that day.
Well, if you want to be anal, you can start by observing Jesus’ death on Wednesday, and his resurrection on Saturday. As opposed to Friday and Sunday.
Or, observe his death on Passover, and his resurrection 3 days later. Consult a Jewish calendar for that.
However, we need to realize that God does not judge us by which days we observe, but by our faith. So rejoice that God rose on the Sabbath, but use this knowledge to draw closer to God, instead of lording it over those who don’t know.
Colossians 2:15-17
despite the fact that i get close to 0 traffic at my diary, sometimes i make a conscious effort to hold back posting(despite the fact that things keep happening in life) when i posted what i consider a very deep post; i know not everybody reads every single new post i make, but maybe those that do just read the top post, so i'm hoping ppl at least read this huge bulk of text when i do, IF they do
have a great day celebrating christ's day of resurrection, ppls; ok onto the reposted entry:
from thursday, october 27, 2005:
What day did Christ die, and what day did he rise again?
It is quite interesting to see how easily people come to believe something they are told within the church without researching things for themselves.
Common belief amongst Christians is that roughly 2000 years ago(more like 1970 or so years), Jesus died on a Friday morning during Passover, and then arose on Sunday morning.
What I wrote below, I basically read from somewhere off the web, and the 1st time I read it, I was shocked. But I sat down, thought about it, diagramed it, and realized it must be true. It all makes sense.
Now, what I’m about to say seems to be pretty controversial, but I encourage you to not debate this by questioning how skewed my ideas are from common belief, but by countering my arguments from the bible itself; I believe that the Bible is the absolute truth from God’s mouth, and that God can’t lie. If you think I’m wrong, show me in the Bible where I’m wrong.
First of all, why what we believe is wrong:
Jesus stated that he would remain dead for 3 full days; that’s 3 days and 3 nights; read the following passage:
Matthew 12:40
That means Jesus could not have died on the supposedly Good Friday and risen on Easter Sunday; if he died on Friday morning, that would mean to fulfill the biblical prophecy, he would have to arise on Monday night(he would have spent Friday night, all of Saturday and Sunday, and Monday morning dead in order to fulfill the prophecy). If he died on Friday night, then he would have to arisen on Tuesday morning. Likewise, if he arose on Sunday morning, he would have died on Wednesday night(all of Thursday, Friday and Saturday spent dead), and if he arose on Sunday night, that would mean he would have had to died on Thursday morning. There are only 1 and a half days that exist between Friday morning and Sunday morning; Friday night and all of Saturday.
Time to look some verses up:
So then, how can we know what day Jesus actually died and what day he actually arose? The Bible does not in plain English state what day Jesus died, and what day he arose.
However, the Bible DOES infer what day Jesus died, and what day he arose, but you have to put two and two together; it does not state in any single passage when he died and arose.
We do know that Jesus died during the day; perhaps either morning or afternoon. That of course, helps us to know that Jesus must have arisen during the night.
Matthew 27:45-50
We also know Jesus died on the Passover; that’s a fact. Because there’s numerous passages that support this belief.
Matthew 26:2; the Son of Man will be crucified on the feast of the passover
John 13:1; again, the last supper took place during the feast of the Passover; Jesus would later die that night
John 18:39; Pilate offers to release one of the prisoners to the Jews, which means that the day that Jesus was crucified was the Passover
What many people don’t seem to know though, is that there were more than 2 Sabbaths that occurred during the Passover at the time of Jesus’ death; yes; two. People don’t even know that Passover coincides at the same time with another holiday that God commanded his people to observe:
Exodus 12:17-20
So we see that Passover is also known as the Feast of Unleavened Bread and spans from the 14th of the 1st month until the 21st of the same month; that makes for a total of 8 days; count them:
14(1) 15(2) 16(3) 17(4) 18(5) 19(6) 20(7) 21(8)
Leviticus says essentially the same thing, but in another way:
Leviticus 23:4-8
It says that the feast of unleavened bread follows the Passover(which occurs on the 14th) and consists of 7 days; the very 1st day, or the 15th of the 1st month, no work is to be done. The 7th day, or the 21st of the 1st month, no work is to be done. According to the definition of a Sabbath, that would make those Sabbath days.
Leviticus 23:2-3
In addition, remember that the Israelites were still required by God to observe the weekly Sabbath on Saturday during those days. Since a full week is 7 days, and the Feast of Unleavened Bread spans 7 days, That means, the Feast of Unleavened Bread could have 3 Sabbaths, with the weekly Sabbath falling somewhere in between the 2 Sabbaths observed during the feast.
This is why in many passages before Jesus’ death, the Passover is referred to as the Preparation; it was also the preparation day for the feast of unleavened bread.
Mark 15:42-47; the preparation is known as the day before the Sabbath
Luke 22:1-8; the feast of unleavened bread is also known as the Passover, which is the day which Jesus ate with his disciples, then later died
John 19:31; the preparation is the day before the Sabbath(a high day), which is why the Jews wanted to take down the bodies, since they could not do work the next day
John 19:14; it was called the preparation OF the Passover, not preparation FOR the Passover, which means that it had the time during the Passover when one prepares for the feast of unleavened bread
Unfortunately, that still does not enable us to pinpoint the location of the weekly Sabbath during the feast, which would greatly help us know which day Jesus died and rose again.
We do know however, that seemingly a contradiction in the Bible exists after Jesus died; read these two passages.
Luke 23:53 – 24:3
Mark 16:1-6
If only 1 Sabbath existed that week, the women couldn’t possibly buy the spices AFTER they’ve prepared them, and God would be lying. But if 2 Sabbaths existed that week, then the women could buy the spices and then prepared them; they bought them after the 1st Sabbath of the feast, and then prepared them before the weekly Sabbath(Saturday). Then, on the very 1st day of the week in the morning(Sunday), they went to Jesus’ grave, only to find that he had already arisen.
With those facts at hand, we can piece together when Jesus died, and when he arose again.
14th of 1st month - Passover:
-Jesus dies in the daytime; he is taken off of the cross, and buried
-Jesus spends a half day in the tomb; 1 night
15th of 1st month – 1st day of feast of unleavened bread; also the 1st of the 2 of the special Sabbaths observed during that time:
-Jesus spends a full day in the tomb; 1 day and 2 nights have elapsed
-The women rest during that day
16th of 1st month – 2nd day of feast of unleavened bread:
-Women buy and prepare the spices so they can perfume Jesus’ dead body
-Jesus spends a full day in the tomb; 2 days and 3 nights have elapsed
17th of 1st month – 3rd day of feast of unleavened bread:
-Women do not go to tomb; they rest, observing the Sabbath; the feast of unleavened bread spans 7 days, and 7 days have not yet elapsed, so this must be the weekly Sabbath, which would make this day Saturday
-Jesus spends the day in the tomb, but only 1 day, not the night, completing the time he said he would be dead; 3 days and 3 nights, then arises and leaves tomb.
-That means Jesus arose on Saturday night.
18th of 1st month – 4th day of feast of unleavened bread:
-Women go to tomb, only to find that Jesus has arisen
Note that this also makes sense; if Jesus arose on Sunday morning, it is quite plausible that the women who came to the tomb would see Jesus arisING, as opposed to an empty tomb.
So, knowing what day Jesus arose(Saturday night), we can now work backward to Passover(Saturday morning, all of Friday, all of Thursday, Wednesday night), and find out that Jesus died on Wednesday, during the day.
And all this makes sense and coincides with that the Bible states:
Between Wednesday morning, when Jesus died, to Saturday night, when he arose, there are 3 full days; Wednesday night, all of Thursday, all of Friday, and Saturday afternoon. Those 3 days, Jesus spent in the middle of the earth(presumably hell), as he said he would. Amazing eh?
We should be observing Saturday and not Sunday.
(I wanted to add another section stating what Easter really was; during that time, it was a pagan religion, but that’s beyond the scope of this subject, and besides, I don’t have any hard evidence at the time to support this)
Ok, so what am I supposed to do with this information?
Treating weekly Saturdays with more reverence than Sunday’s a good start; I don’t mean to not go to Sunday church and do what you do on Sundays, but inward, have more respect for Saturdays and what you do during that day.
Well, if you want to be anal, you can start by observing Jesus’ death on Wednesday, and his resurrection on Saturday. As opposed to Friday and Sunday.
Or, observe his death on Passover, and his resurrection 3 days later. Consult a Jewish calendar for that.
However, we need to realize that God does not judge us by which days we observe, but by our faith. So rejoice that God rose on the Sabbath, but use this knowledge to draw closer to God, instead of lording it over those who don’t know.
Colossians 2:15-17
Friday, April 14, 2006
i keep insisting that dwight howard's gonna be something great...
and i've taken a liking to him...
and while it is partially b/c he's a christian, it's not the entire story, or the main reason i like him.
it just seems like he has the potential to be the next really good big man in the nba... and you know how i love bigs. but the thing is that he doesn't appear to be slow.
he's athletic, bulky, tremendous on the boards, and a great defensive player. all things that seem to fit the mold of a big player that i like.
tim duncan said it best when he said he's thankful he's not gonna be in the nba anytime that much longer, b/c this guy's going to be too good.
kg was wondering what the hell they put in the milk the kids drink these days when he was commenting on dwight.
and i've taken a liking to him...
and while it is partially b/c he's a christian, it's not the entire story, or the main reason i like him.
it just seems like he has the potential to be the next really good big man in the nba... and you know how i love bigs. but the thing is that he doesn't appear to be slow.
he's athletic, bulky, tremendous on the boards, and a great defensive player. all things that seem to fit the mold of a big player that i like.
tim duncan said it best when he said he's thankful he's not gonna be in the nba anytime that much longer, b/c this guy's going to be too good.
kg was wondering what the hell they put in the milk the kids drink these days when he was commenting on dwight.
Thursday, April 13, 2006
hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
so you wanna learn self-defense...
"We grab. But just to make sure, we grab with this arm, also."
i have never laughed so hard for such a long time...
so you wanna learn self-defense...
"We grab. But just to make sure, we grab with this arm, also."
i have never laughed so hard for such a long time...
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
something i just realized last night concerning tim duncan's game...
it's becoming less and less distinguished by the bank shot from the side... despite the fact that that's what people insist his game revolves around...
tim duncan's game revolves around a REALLY horizontal floater that he puts up near the basket...
and the more i think about it(he reaches more towards the basket than upward), the more i realize why i've always thought his shooting does indeed look ugly in the past(but never truly realized its effectiveness).
i mean, he's tall, but no lightweight like kg, so all he needs is one second of hesitation from the low posting opponent, and you can put that shot up without getting it blocked. and besides, since he's reaching forward, since he's low posting, it's pretty hard to block it without committing some foul, since a lotta shot blocks happen at the apex of your shooting animation, not in mid-animation, and since he's reaching forward, the opponent has to in fact either stop his shot before it's fully extended, which is risky, and often times can draw a foul, or reach backward to block the shot, which is also quite hard, and also prone to picking up a goaltend.
yaarrr... genius.
---
the matrix was too much for the kings to handle down the 4th quarter.
---
i'm getting back into vfevo again; vf5 looks SOOO good! the test videos of that game look incredible.
after months of playing tekken straight up, it's made my vf look like crap, especially since this is my 1st time playing vf on console with an arcade joystick, and i can't hit down/left consistently... it's pissing me off when i'm trying to crouch dash.
it's becoming less and less distinguished by the bank shot from the side... despite the fact that that's what people insist his game revolves around...
tim duncan's game revolves around a REALLY horizontal floater that he puts up near the basket...
and the more i think about it(he reaches more towards the basket than upward), the more i realize why i've always thought his shooting does indeed look ugly in the past(but never truly realized its effectiveness).
i mean, he's tall, but no lightweight like kg, so all he needs is one second of hesitation from the low posting opponent, and you can put that shot up without getting it blocked. and besides, since he's reaching forward, since he's low posting, it's pretty hard to block it without committing some foul, since a lotta shot blocks happen at the apex of your shooting animation, not in mid-animation, and since he's reaching forward, the opponent has to in fact either stop his shot before it's fully extended, which is risky, and often times can draw a foul, or reach backward to block the shot, which is also quite hard, and also prone to picking up a goaltend.
yaarrr... genius.
---
the matrix was too much for the kings to handle down the 4th quarter.
---
i'm getting back into vfevo again; vf5 looks SOOO good! the test videos of that game look incredible.
after months of playing tekken straight up, it's made my vf look like crap, especially since this is my 1st time playing vf on console with an arcade joystick, and i can't hit down/left consistently... it's pissing me off when i'm trying to crouch dash.
Monday, April 10, 2006
Friday, April 07, 2006
what's w/all the laker fans at the pepsi center last night?
yeah, you deserve to sit down and shut up...
carmelo's more clutch than your kobe this year, and you KNOW it...
---
for all your ssb n64 fox fans:
unreal death combo vs fox
btw, that was done by isai... that guy's a beast.
yeah, you deserve to sit down and shut up...
carmelo's more clutch than your kobe this year, and you KNOW it...
---
for all your ssb n64 fox fans:
unreal death combo vs fox
btw, that was done by isai... that guy's a beast.
Wednesday, April 05, 2006
weird how long the rain is continuing to pour down...
but i love the rain...
it's hard to explain why... and i'm not saying i want this over sunshine... i don't know how to explain it...
part of the reason is because i know that God created it, so i try to take joy in it.
and i'd say another part is the feeling of perpetual light drops of water falling on your head as you're walking around outside IS NOT AS BAD AS PEOPLE ACT LIKE IT IS! if you did not get so afraid that your clothes are going to get ruined by water, you'd actually appreciate what a downpour is!
but i love the rain...
it's hard to explain why... and i'm not saying i want this over sunshine... i don't know how to explain it...
part of the reason is because i know that God created it, so i try to take joy in it.
and i'd say another part is the feeling of perpetual light drops of water falling on your head as you're walking around outside IS NOT AS BAD AS PEOPLE ACT LIKE IT IS! if you did not get so afraid that your clothes are going to get ruined by water, you'd actually appreciate what a downpour is!
kim bap must be the korean equivalent of tza bun/chow fun(fried rice for all you non-taiwanese lurkers).
b/c everytime msm gives free dinners, they always seem to put this stuff up.
like i've said, it's pretty much the equivalent of fried rice gone korean. just that the eggs aren't scrambled, you use lettuce instead of peas, slice the vegetables lengthwise instead of dicing them, no green onion(i THINK that's always added to tza bun), and of course, it's a korean dish, so you have to add hot sauce.
---
but i'm confused; everytime i look for a "kimbap" or "kim bap" recipe on google, it always turns up that seaweed's in the recipe, and not hot sauce's added; is there something that msm's not including in this dish? am i calling this dish by some other name? confused... they also compare it more to sushi...
maybe it's bibimbap? the results i turned up for googling "kimbap" with "hot sauce" together have some pages listing bibimbap, with similar ingredients to that of the dish i've seen and eaten.
maybe my ears are just not tuned enough?
i'm just gonna assume it's bibimbap...
---
fyi, one of the things i'm gonna consider in the future is self-learning japanese and korean, maybe mandarin. but especially japanese; you can't play fighting games without the japanese influence seen, and so it would massively help me if i could actually browse japanese websites without getting lost; using altavista doesn't quite cut it, because it translates the pages into fobenese.
b/c everytime msm gives free dinners, they always seem to put this stuff up.
like i've said, it's pretty much the equivalent of fried rice gone korean. just that the eggs aren't scrambled, you use lettuce instead of peas, slice the vegetables lengthwise instead of dicing them, no green onion(i THINK that's always added to tza bun), and of course, it's a korean dish, so you have to add hot sauce.
---
but i'm confused; everytime i look for a "kimbap" or "kim bap" recipe on google, it always turns up that seaweed's in the recipe, and not hot sauce's added; is there something that msm's not including in this dish? am i calling this dish by some other name? confused... they also compare it more to sushi...
maybe it's bibimbap? the results i turned up for googling "kimbap" with "hot sauce" together have some pages listing bibimbap, with similar ingredients to that of the dish i've seen and eaten.
maybe my ears are just not tuned enough?
i'm just gonna assume it's bibimbap...
---
fyi, one of the things i'm gonna consider in the future is self-learning japanese and korean, maybe mandarin. but especially japanese; you can't play fighting games without the japanese influence seen, and so it would massively help me if i could actually browse japanese websites without getting lost; using altavista doesn't quite cut it, because it translates the pages into fobenese.
Monday, April 03, 2006
ykno, when all is said and done, there was no reason to try to plan things out of obligation for sister's encouragement night. it would've screwed things up.
this mindset that a few of the senior guys shared, including me, was confirmed when we saw the grateful smiles beaming from all of the girls.
but if you wanna thank someone in particular, thank david g; i think the strawberry cheesecake that he made did it; ykno how girls are suckers for desserts. thank GOD whatever expensive dessert place in sac we called was totally booked.
the other two i would personally thank would be j-woo and david s. the 1st for opening up the house, and the 2nd for being the main driving force behind this whole night.
all in all, good job on a good night. to everybody who helped. or showed up to get appreciated.
this mindset that a few of the senior guys shared, including me, was confirmed when we saw the grateful smiles beaming from all of the girls.
but if you wanna thank someone in particular, thank david g; i think the strawberry cheesecake that he made did it; ykno how girls are suckers for desserts. thank GOD whatever expensive dessert place in sac we called was totally booked.
the other two i would personally thank would be j-woo and david s. the 1st for opening up the house, and the 2nd for being the main driving force behind this whole night.
all in all, good job on a good night. to everybody who helped. or showed up to get appreciated.
Friday, March 31, 2006
just to give you an idea of how messed up arcadia's rankings are:
Tekken 5: Dark Resurrection
A Class:
Kazuya
Law
Heihachi
Jack-5
B Class:
Asuka
Christie
Marduk
Nina
Julia
Yoshimitsu
Feng
Xiaoyu
Devil Jin
Paul
C Class:
Ganryu
Bryan
Steve
King
Raven
Anna
Wang
Lee
Lei
D Class:
Jin
Kuma/Panda
Baek
Hwoarang
Bruce
Roger
new characters aren't included in the list
aaand...
Virtua Fighter 4: Final Tuned
Top-High:
Kage
Jacky
Top-low:
Pai
Aoi
Mid-High:
Lau
Sara
Mid-Low:
Akira
Wolf
Lion
Low-High:
Vanessa
Brad
Shun
Low-Low:
Jeffry
Gou
Leifei
---
you can compare them to the korean tk5:dr rankings by looking in my march's diary posts...
i'm just including the vf4:ft rankings not b/c they're wack, but b/c i'm a big vf fan. fairly good, but vanessa should be a lot higher, ditto w/lei. shun should be slightly up. fairly good otherwise, IMO.
Tekken 5: Dark Resurrection
A Class:
Kazuya
Law
Heihachi
Jack-5
B Class:
Asuka
Christie
Marduk
Nina
Julia
Yoshimitsu
Feng
Xiaoyu
Devil Jin
Paul
C Class:
Ganryu
Bryan
Steve
King
Raven
Anna
Wang
Lee
Lei
D Class:
Jin
Kuma/Panda
Baek
Hwoarang
Bruce
Roger
new characters aren't included in the list
aaand...
Virtua Fighter 4: Final Tuned
Top-High:
Kage
Jacky
Top-low:
Pai
Aoi
Mid-High:
Lau
Sara
Mid-Low:
Akira
Wolf
Lion
Low-High:
Vanessa
Brad
Shun
Low-Low:
Jeffry
Gou
Leifei
---
you can compare them to the korean tk5:dr rankings by looking in my march's diary posts...
i'm just including the vf4:ft rankings not b/c they're wack, but b/c i'm a big vf fan. fairly good, but vanessa should be a lot higher, ditto w/lei. shun should be slightly up. fairly good otherwise, IMO.
Thursday, March 30, 2006
i know pistons are PARTIALLY to blame, but sixers seriously did not look like they showed up wanting to play.
i consider myself a new skool jazz fan; i love the combination of okur, ak and boozer. and i am just STUNNED how ak can get so many blocks and steals in a game... IMO he is the best defensive player in the nba. i really enjoyed watching them fight the nuggets and win that game... they would probably face an early exit if they got into the playoffs at all, but i would love for them to make it.
is this a coincidence? that almost all the great defensive-minded coaches in the nba are the ones which are the hardest on their players? i mean, i can list exceptions(MAYBE chicago and detroit), but i think you understand. coaches aren't hired to teach effort. they're hired to teach technique and execution. but if you get up in them and drive them so they want to perform harder at least to shut you up, you can help reach into that effort capability. i say this b/c mo cheeks is very lax; we all know how lax the sixer's d is. doc rivers is very laid back; celtics aren't exactly the best defensive team either. rick charlisle does NOT take crap from his players; indiana constantly ranks amongst the best defensive teams in the league. ditto w/gregg poppavich. avery johnson doesn't have THE best defensive players, but he gets up in their grill, and it has shown with the increase in wins and defense(pushing aside the bogus losses, like the manhandle against the cavs yesterday). etc.
of course, we could cite the knicks. but that's different as well.
i consider myself a new skool jazz fan; i love the combination of okur, ak and boozer. and i am just STUNNED how ak can get so many blocks and steals in a game... IMO he is the best defensive player in the nba. i really enjoyed watching them fight the nuggets and win that game... they would probably face an early exit if they got into the playoffs at all, but i would love for them to make it.
is this a coincidence? that almost all the great defensive-minded coaches in the nba are the ones which are the hardest on their players? i mean, i can list exceptions(MAYBE chicago and detroit), but i think you understand. coaches aren't hired to teach effort. they're hired to teach technique and execution. but if you get up in them and drive them so they want to perform harder at least to shut you up, you can help reach into that effort capability. i say this b/c mo cheeks is very lax; we all know how lax the sixer's d is. doc rivers is very laid back; celtics aren't exactly the best defensive team either. rick charlisle does NOT take crap from his players; indiana constantly ranks amongst the best defensive teams in the league. ditto w/gregg poppavich. avery johnson doesn't have THE best defensive players, but he gets up in their grill, and it has shown with the increase in wins and defense(pushing aside the bogus losses, like the manhandle against the cavs yesterday). etc.
of course, we could cite the knicks. but that's different as well.
Wednesday, March 29, 2006
today is the beginning of what will probably be an end to my college days...
let's hope i actually do things right this time around.
schedule doesn't look TOO bad; i'm just hoping i get an internship...
that, good grades, and getting a 1-2 yr science job would be great...
---
ucdavis bookstore actually sells a "ucdavis cowtipping team" baseball cap... got a few chuckles outta me... maybe i'll buy it someday later, heh heh.
---
i remembered once stopping @ a red light in ucdavis, and one of the cars opposite me was making a left turn. the passenger riding shotgun stuck his head out the window and opened a centerfold showing a woman's breasts showing it to the people outside of the car in sight and yelling something with a smile which i couldn't hear since my windows were rolled up... that got me dying with laughter. i look around and i'm seeing a woman pedestrian waiting at the crosswalk laughing too, and a female driver in the car next to me cracking her head off too, so i'm assuming this wasn't sexist. i dunno where i'm going with this, i just re-remembered this, and it was pretty funny.
---
remembered once seeing a top 10 on sportscenter, and it was women's ncaa basketball; one woman's attempting to take a wide-open 3, and a woman on the opposite team runs out to help and just SWATS the ball into the crowd... that was crazy... like a man-block.
---
i'm actually going to be trying watching ucla vs lsu this saturday for final four; ucla has actually concentrated upon defense a LOT this year with their head coach; they beat memphis, a high-scoring team by grinding it out. farmer chose to go to ucla b/c the coach was the ONLY one who approached him telling him if he went to ucla, they would teach him defense, and they would win a championship(as opposed to the 1000s of other coaches who told him he would be a star and lead the league in scoring). they surprised everybody by beating gonzaga with their defense. they have a decently deep team, and they concentrate upon the right stuff.
lsu is not as balanced, but again, i love them because of their great frontcourt; a rarity in college basketball these days. thomas and davis are like yin and yang; one's great b/c of his bulk, the other's great b/c of his athleticism. both are great defensively, but do things offensively as well. due to the fact that i started really loving the big guy positions(3-5) over the guards when i got into basketball for real, and you can understand why i like these guys so much. it's further augmented when you see that larry brown would REALLY like tyrus thomas to be on the knicks(not getting him though; i would like to see tyrus end up on the atlanta hawks, if not the warriors)
george mason and florida is also a great matchup, but sometimes i'm wondering if gm's getting too much attention now, and whether it might throw them off. so i'm not going to actually watch that game, but concentrate on lsu and ucla.
---
wizards whup on the kings, WITHOUT arenas... caron butler was on fire, daniels was rolling, etc... win by 13... sweeeeet... etan thomas sent a lotta shots back at the kings.
nets have been looking a LOT better as of late. they beat the pistons on their home court, and then handed suns their asses.
i'm still getting the feeling that detroit's not trying their hardest... not like in the beginning of the season. they haven't run away with home court advantage yet and secured it throughout, so i'm wondering why they're resting their starters more, as flip claims to be doing. though, if you want to rest your starters, it might be better to do it now, and then enter the playoffs with full steam, than to burn out the starters now, and then rest for a long period; you'd be shaky near the beginning of the playoffs, and it might cost you.
that said, you can't just say you want to WIN games and that they'll happen. i think that's something some people have to realize. it's something I have to realize at times. it is a matter of what your opponent is capable of during the game video reviews, what you're doing to counteract that capability, what your opponent does instead thinking what YOU'RE going to do to counteract THAT, and whether or not you or your opponent just has the shots falling. also effort. etc. to assume it's always up is wrong. that said, the better teams will have the odds fall their way more times than not. although we still cringe everytime we see an upset, but those should be more rare; in more cases, the better team will win, period.
---
the fact that we need to work hard in order to achieve things doesn't necessarily dispute the existance of a god predetermining everything in this world. the analogy seen to this in the Bible is one of a farmer who is trying to grow a crop. like a farmer, we can only provide the proper conditions for the seed to grow. we can plant it in good fertilized soil, provide it with adequate protection from predators, water it with the right amounts to give it moisture. but God still needs to provide adequate sunlight in order for you to produce a crop. else nothing will happen. (this idea was ALSO conveyed in Foster's Celebration of Discipline)
granted, this set of verses below which i got this idea were used to explain why God does everything, and why we shouldn't be under a certain church leader, like Paul or Apollos. but it still gives the same idea.
1st Corinthians:
{3:3} For ye are yet carnal: for whereas [there is] among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?
{3:4} For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I [am] of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
{3:5} Who then is Paul, and who [is] Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?
{3:6} I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.
{3:7} So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.
the thing that i'm still wrestling over with though, is couldn't God just give us the proper conditions for the seed and soil as well if he wanted us to do these things and we didn't, ie we didn't plant the seed? surely God does not wait upon us if we don't insist on planting and then we die and God goes "whoops."
but perhaps i'm diving too deep into this; the truth is that there's a multitude of factors that i'm probably not considering in this scenario. one of them could be that God needs to give us the desire to plant the seed. that is why we struggle in sin many times, because the desire and fortitude to conquer it did not come from God himself.
---
|
it's sorta like the arguments i've seen for why predestination exists; many Christians use Revelations 3:20 to support a free-will policy of Jesus' redemption:
Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.
So we see a cause and effect;
cause: we hear God's voice, effect: we open the door
cause: we open the door, effect: Jesus comes into our heart
But there are problems with that argument; the 1st is notice the original intent of this letter in Revelations; it wasn't to unbelievers; it was to the 7 churches. now if this letter was meant to support free will, why are you wasting valuable time and ink writing these words to churchgoers?
The 2nd is this; we haven't tackled the CAUSE of what leads to the EFFECT of us hearing God's voice, you see? Most Christians see this verse, and stop, thinking great! All I have to do is hear God's voice. The problem though is that the Bible has clearly stated that none can hear God's voice. God must make those he decides to save hear his voice.
|
---
So the point of that deviation was to show that in like vein, it probably isn't as simple as 1) we want to do God's will 2) we plant the seed and nurture it 3) God does the rest. but maybe more like 0) God plants the heart to want to do God's will.
let's hope i actually do things right this time around.
schedule doesn't look TOO bad; i'm just hoping i get an internship...
that, good grades, and getting a 1-2 yr science job would be great...
---
ucdavis bookstore actually sells a "ucdavis cowtipping team" baseball cap... got a few chuckles outta me... maybe i'll buy it someday later, heh heh.
---
i remembered once stopping @ a red light in ucdavis, and one of the cars opposite me was making a left turn. the passenger riding shotgun stuck his head out the window and opened a centerfold showing a woman's breasts showing it to the people outside of the car in sight and yelling something with a smile which i couldn't hear since my windows were rolled up... that got me dying with laughter. i look around and i'm seeing a woman pedestrian waiting at the crosswalk laughing too, and a female driver in the car next to me cracking her head off too, so i'm assuming this wasn't sexist. i dunno where i'm going with this, i just re-remembered this, and it was pretty funny.
---
remembered once seeing a top 10 on sportscenter, and it was women's ncaa basketball; one woman's attempting to take a wide-open 3, and a woman on the opposite team runs out to help and just SWATS the ball into the crowd... that was crazy... like a man-block.
---
i'm actually going to be trying watching ucla vs lsu this saturday for final four; ucla has actually concentrated upon defense a LOT this year with their head coach; they beat memphis, a high-scoring team by grinding it out. farmer chose to go to ucla b/c the coach was the ONLY one who approached him telling him if he went to ucla, they would teach him defense, and they would win a championship(as opposed to the 1000s of other coaches who told him he would be a star and lead the league in scoring). they surprised everybody by beating gonzaga with their defense. they have a decently deep team, and they concentrate upon the right stuff.
lsu is not as balanced, but again, i love them because of their great frontcourt; a rarity in college basketball these days. thomas and davis are like yin and yang; one's great b/c of his bulk, the other's great b/c of his athleticism. both are great defensively, but do things offensively as well. due to the fact that i started really loving the big guy positions(3-5) over the guards when i got into basketball for real, and you can understand why i like these guys so much. it's further augmented when you see that larry brown would REALLY like tyrus thomas to be on the knicks(not getting him though; i would like to see tyrus end up on the atlanta hawks, if not the warriors)
george mason and florida is also a great matchup, but sometimes i'm wondering if gm's getting too much attention now, and whether it might throw them off. so i'm not going to actually watch that game, but concentrate on lsu and ucla.
---
wizards whup on the kings, WITHOUT arenas... caron butler was on fire, daniels was rolling, etc... win by 13... sweeeeet... etan thomas sent a lotta shots back at the kings.
nets have been looking a LOT better as of late. they beat the pistons on their home court, and then handed suns their asses.
i'm still getting the feeling that detroit's not trying their hardest... not like in the beginning of the season. they haven't run away with home court advantage yet and secured it throughout, so i'm wondering why they're resting their starters more, as flip claims to be doing. though, if you want to rest your starters, it might be better to do it now, and then enter the playoffs with full steam, than to burn out the starters now, and then rest for a long period; you'd be shaky near the beginning of the playoffs, and it might cost you.
that said, you can't just say you want to WIN games and that they'll happen. i think that's something some people have to realize. it's something I have to realize at times. it is a matter of what your opponent is capable of during the game video reviews, what you're doing to counteract that capability, what your opponent does instead thinking what YOU'RE going to do to counteract THAT, and whether or not you or your opponent just has the shots falling. also effort. etc. to assume it's always up is wrong. that said, the better teams will have the odds fall their way more times than not. although we still cringe everytime we see an upset, but those should be more rare; in more cases, the better team will win, period.
---
the fact that we need to work hard in order to achieve things doesn't necessarily dispute the existance of a god predetermining everything in this world. the analogy seen to this in the Bible is one of a farmer who is trying to grow a crop. like a farmer, we can only provide the proper conditions for the seed to grow. we can plant it in good fertilized soil, provide it with adequate protection from predators, water it with the right amounts to give it moisture. but God still needs to provide adequate sunlight in order for you to produce a crop. else nothing will happen. (this idea was ALSO conveyed in Foster's Celebration of Discipline)
granted, this set of verses below which i got this idea were used to explain why God does everything, and why we shouldn't be under a certain church leader, like Paul or Apollos. but it still gives the same idea.
1st Corinthians:
{3:3} For ye are yet carnal: for whereas [there is] among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?
{3:4} For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I [am] of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
{3:5} Who then is Paul, and who [is] Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?
{3:6} I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.
{3:7} So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.
the thing that i'm still wrestling over with though, is couldn't God just give us the proper conditions for the seed and soil as well if he wanted us to do these things and we didn't, ie we didn't plant the seed? surely God does not wait upon us if we don't insist on planting and then we die and God goes "whoops."
but perhaps i'm diving too deep into this; the truth is that there's a multitude of factors that i'm probably not considering in this scenario. one of them could be that God needs to give us the desire to plant the seed. that is why we struggle in sin many times, because the desire and fortitude to conquer it did not come from God himself.
---
|
it's sorta like the arguments i've seen for why predestination exists; many Christians use Revelations 3:20 to support a free-will policy of Jesus' redemption:
Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.
So we see a cause and effect;
cause: we hear God's voice, effect: we open the door
cause: we open the door, effect: Jesus comes into our heart
But there are problems with that argument; the 1st is notice the original intent of this letter in Revelations; it wasn't to unbelievers; it was to the 7 churches. now if this letter was meant to support free will, why are you wasting valuable time and ink writing these words to churchgoers?
The 2nd is this; we haven't tackled the CAUSE of what leads to the EFFECT of us hearing God's voice, you see? Most Christians see this verse, and stop, thinking great! All I have to do is hear God's voice. The problem though is that the Bible has clearly stated that none can hear God's voice. God must make those he decides to save hear his voice.
|
---
So the point of that deviation was to show that in like vein, it probably isn't as simple as 1) we want to do God's will 2) we plant the seed and nurture it 3) God does the rest. but maybe more like 0) God plants the heart to want to do God's will.
Sunday, March 26, 2006
holla at cha boi...
defense really does win championships...
george mason is going to the final four.
---
pelican universal arcade stick is garbage compared to a real hori stick...
i got so used for the 1st on jon's ps2 playing ttt that i couldn't wavedash at all using the 2nd at tk5:dr at svgl.
could still do EWGF almost at will without any sidesteps, so that wasn't a problem.
devil jin looks good in tk5:dr; lost the ability to do a safe mid-level combo starter, but he can now low crush, which should take care of low punchers while he's wavedashing.
defense really does win championships...
george mason is going to the final four.
---
pelican universal arcade stick is garbage compared to a real hori stick...
i got so used for the 1st on jon's ps2 playing ttt that i couldn't wavedash at all using the 2nd at tk5:dr at svgl.
could still do EWGF almost at will without any sidesteps, so that wasn't a problem.
devil jin looks good in tk5:dr; lost the ability to do a safe mid-level combo starter, but he can now low crush, which should take care of low punchers while he's wavedashing.
Saturday, March 25, 2006
working on a leeching internet, so i gotta make my posts quick.
i'm not usually a close follower of ncaa bball; the main reason being, the players on a team change so quickly each year(nba changes quickly too, but at least there's more solidarity if you kinda get what i mean), and there's so many teams to follow, that many will slip under your nose. but i'm really liking two teams this year:
george mason and lsu.
i was totally impressed with the frontcourt of lsu today; glen davis' bulk kills everybody on both ends; he's so good offensively, and tremendous with the rebounds. and his buddy, tyrus thomas is equally dominant in the paint, but due to his athleticism instead of his bulk; not just a high flyer, but with the ability to catch many alley-oops, stuffing shots with his high hops, and good ability to get close buckets. screw guards and jacking up 3s; they totally won my support watching them take on the longhorns and win the game by their two bigs.
and george mason... man... surprising everybody. but i guess that's why people always say defense wins championships eh? we'll see what happens tomorrow against uconn.
i'm not usually a close follower of ncaa bball; the main reason being, the players on a team change so quickly each year(nba changes quickly too, but at least there's more solidarity if you kinda get what i mean), and there's so many teams to follow, that many will slip under your nose. but i'm really liking two teams this year:
george mason and lsu.
i was totally impressed with the frontcourt of lsu today; glen davis' bulk kills everybody on both ends; he's so good offensively, and tremendous with the rebounds. and his buddy, tyrus thomas is equally dominant in the paint, but due to his athleticism instead of his bulk; not just a high flyer, but with the ability to catch many alley-oops, stuffing shots with his high hops, and good ability to get close buckets. screw guards and jacking up 3s; they totally won my support watching them take on the longhorns and win the game by their two bigs.
and george mason... man... surprising everybody. but i guess that's why people always say defense wins championships eh? we'll see what happens tomorrow against uconn.
Thursday, March 23, 2006
fyi, in case you're wondering, i'll start working on my electric guitar skills and getting back to songwriting and putting up those songs on my other website once i'm done with ucdavis. it's been a LOOONG time but...
just thought i'd throw that out there;
it just seems that in between school, my kjv-onlyism projects, freetime spent on tekken and msm cg group, i just wouldn't have that much time to work on it.
but once i'm out of college for a year or two, i won't have internet at home, so i'll have a bit more free time to work on that.
btw, i'm thinking about getting this product; i saw it at fry's in sacramento:
iMIC
i also checked its reviews at harmonycentral.com and i like what i see; one of the cheaper ways to connect an input/output to your cpu and it bypasses most of the electronic equipment on your cpu, which eliminates the buzzing sound which would come out during recording or audio(guess why i would want to buy THAT?)
and when you compare it price-wise to all the other usb audio interface things and see that it's like 40 at fry's and everything else's 70 plus, i think you know why this is a good buy.
other usb output products
just thought i'd throw that out there;
it just seems that in between school, my kjv-onlyism projects, freetime spent on tekken and msm cg group, i just wouldn't have that much time to work on it.
but once i'm out of college for a year or two, i won't have internet at home, so i'll have a bit more free time to work on that.
btw, i'm thinking about getting this product; i saw it at fry's in sacramento:
iMIC
i also checked its reviews at harmonycentral.com and i like what i see; one of the cheaper ways to connect an input/output to your cpu and it bypasses most of the electronic equipment on your cpu, which eliminates the buzzing sound which would come out during recording or audio(guess why i would want to buy THAT?)
and when you compare it price-wise to all the other usb audio interface things and see that it's like 40 at fry's and everything else's 70 plus, i think you know why this is a good buy.
other usb output products
Wednesday, March 22, 2006
Tuesday, March 21, 2006
Monday, March 20, 2006
sports all around has been so weird lately:
kings(since i'm forced to watch them and their DREADFUL commentators whenever i want to see bball) lose to pacers and twolves despite their recently good status (both were great games btw; fairly close. the indy crowds were just letting artest have it, and kg put up 37-10; not like the usual 20-10-ish stuff he did. i really like kg and his unselfishness, but he really has to decide whether he needs to carry the twolves on his back offensively by scoring more and get more wins, or get others involved, and make them better in the long run, but lose more.
heat are doing really good. so when they visit detroit, this'll really be a measuring stick for each team. detroit has seemed to lose that fire that they started with in the beginning of the season, while we are seeing miami at their best as of right now.
george mason beat north carolina... (gm has the #1 defense in ncaa this year others have said; i'm impressed)
blake beat rafael nadal... (this is sweet; some of his shots were just crazy; now if only he could beat roger federer)
wbc: korea beats japan, but us loses to mexico, so japan plays korea AGAIN, and hands them their asses(msm's not going to be happy). and oh yeah; cuba beats the dominican republic. and while the game isn't over, i'm pretty sure japan's going to win unless cuba pulls out a miracle. yep, matsui shouldn't have listened to george steinbrenner(i think i spelled his name wrong), and played; would've gotten a free medal or trophy or ring or what not.
aaaand... to's in dallas next season, NOT denver. i think this'll be interesting, b/c bill parcels really does not take crap from any player, and will throw it on the player. i was watching sportscenter, and they were interviewing all these players that played for him, and you get the sense that he does NOT take crap from any player. i know we aren't supposed to wish bad will towards others, but this will be interesting to see if TO actually sticks his neck out or not(there's probably a million ppl who wish he does... and then gets it cut off).
btw, be glad i'm not using xanga, b/c @ the frequencies that i put up new posts, i would constantly be near the top of every xanga thread i subscribe to.
---
not really related, but i wanted to say something about the nba... a lotta ppl say so-and-so player's great for the nba.
i want to say that i think larry brown is great for the nba.
there's a million things i could say about him; his simple, but effective gameplan(play the right way, be unselfish, play hard on both ends, share the ball, have fun, etc), but i'll concentrate on one aspect for this post:
he loves and respects the players that he plays with or against.
i mean, the guy had every right to talk down to stephon marbury. the guy does not try to play selflessly, he does not try to play defense, etc. he's basically a streetballer(and unlike allen iverson, who is also a streetballer, but meshed well with brown for the most part, does not try to work with brown) and when brown benches him against the hawks for the 4th quarter and the home crowd boos marbury, he feels so bad after the game that he speaks up and apologizes, and states that he'll try to work something out("no player should ever be booed by his home team" or something to that extent).
let's not forget the 20 second timeout he called when there were about 10 seconds left game 6 against the indiana pacers, and it was clear that reggie miller was going to retire without a ring. the minute miller goes out, brown calls time, then instead of drawing up a play in a huddle, walks into the middle of the court and proceeds to clap in respect of reggie. total class.
he also did something similar when he was a coach at philly when mj played his final game ever. called a timeout, proceeded to clap.
oh sure, he's not perfect. i think the way he coaches offense could use a bit more work, despite the right idea being there. but i think he's a more positive influence for this nba than other ppl give him respect for.
kings(since i'm forced to watch them and their DREADFUL commentators whenever i want to see bball) lose to pacers and twolves despite their recently good status (both were great games btw; fairly close. the indy crowds were just letting artest have it, and kg put up 37-10; not like the usual 20-10-ish stuff he did. i really like kg and his unselfishness, but he really has to decide whether he needs to carry the twolves on his back offensively by scoring more and get more wins, or get others involved, and make them better in the long run, but lose more.
heat are doing really good. so when they visit detroit, this'll really be a measuring stick for each team. detroit has seemed to lose that fire that they started with in the beginning of the season, while we are seeing miami at their best as of right now.
george mason beat north carolina... (gm has the #1 defense in ncaa this year others have said; i'm impressed)
blake beat rafael nadal... (this is sweet; some of his shots were just crazy; now if only he could beat roger federer)
wbc: korea beats japan, but us loses to mexico, so japan plays korea AGAIN, and hands them their asses(msm's not going to be happy). and oh yeah; cuba beats the dominican republic. and while the game isn't over, i'm pretty sure japan's going to win unless cuba pulls out a miracle. yep, matsui shouldn't have listened to george steinbrenner(i think i spelled his name wrong), and played; would've gotten a free medal or trophy or ring or what not.
aaaand... to's in dallas next season, NOT denver. i think this'll be interesting, b/c bill parcels really does not take crap from any player, and will throw it on the player. i was watching sportscenter, and they were interviewing all these players that played for him, and you get the sense that he does NOT take crap from any player. i know we aren't supposed to wish bad will towards others, but this will be interesting to see if TO actually sticks his neck out or not(there's probably a million ppl who wish he does... and then gets it cut off).
btw, be glad i'm not using xanga, b/c @ the frequencies that i put up new posts, i would constantly be near the top of every xanga thread i subscribe to.
---
not really related, but i wanted to say something about the nba... a lotta ppl say so-and-so player's great for the nba.
i want to say that i think larry brown is great for the nba.
there's a million things i could say about him; his simple, but effective gameplan(play the right way, be unselfish, play hard on both ends, share the ball, have fun, etc), but i'll concentrate on one aspect for this post:
he loves and respects the players that he plays with or against.
i mean, the guy had every right to talk down to stephon marbury. the guy does not try to play selflessly, he does not try to play defense, etc. he's basically a streetballer(and unlike allen iverson, who is also a streetballer, but meshed well with brown for the most part, does not try to work with brown) and when brown benches him against the hawks for the 4th quarter and the home crowd boos marbury, he feels so bad after the game that he speaks up and apologizes, and states that he'll try to work something out("no player should ever be booed by his home team" or something to that extent).
let's not forget the 20 second timeout he called when there were about 10 seconds left game 6 against the indiana pacers, and it was clear that reggie miller was going to retire without a ring. the minute miller goes out, brown calls time, then instead of drawing up a play in a huddle, walks into the middle of the court and proceeds to clap in respect of reggie. total class.
he also did something similar when he was a coach at philly when mj played his final game ever. called a timeout, proceeded to clap.
oh sure, he's not perfect. i think the way he coaches offense could use a bit more work, despite the right idea being there. but i think he's a more positive influence for this nba than other ppl give him respect for.
figures i should've checked my hotmail account more often...
now that i did today, all the emails in it were deleted... there is absolutely NOTHING within it.
whatever...
i think i'll use gmail as my primary email from now on...
but yeah, now i have 1 immediate niece to go with my 1 immediate nephew.
so weird how time flies.
but since all my emails in the hotmail account were gone, i have no friggin idea whether phil sent me an email regarding what happened or not.
now that i did today, all the emails in it were deleted... there is absolutely NOTHING within it.
whatever...
i think i'll use gmail as my primary email from now on...
but yeah, now i have 1 immediate niece to go with my 1 immediate nephew.
so weird how time flies.
but since all my emails in the hotmail account were gone, i have no friggin idea whether phil sent me an email regarding what happened or not.
what really sucks is when you want to get these songs, like really like them, but you can't download them because they're not currently available.
sucks because you really want to be a good citizen and all, but they're not helping you.
and trying to buy the entire cd is sometimes a complete waste.
anyways, i really like these two songs; it's a shame they're not on napster.com:
third day/steven curtis chapman/mercy me - i see love
third day - blessed assurance
sucks because you really want to be a good citizen and all, but they're not helping you.
and trying to buy the entire cd is sometimes a complete waste.
anyways, i really like these two songs; it's a shame they're not on napster.com:
third day/steven curtis chapman/mercy me - i see love
third day - blessed assurance
Sunday, March 19, 2006
i used to wonder why galatians used the term "schoolmaster" to describe the use of the law(old testament) until jesus came, knowing that it was ultimately useless:
Galatians 3:24-25 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
But for some reason, TODAY i got it:
Romans 7:7
What shall we say then? [Is] the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
It is a schoolmaster, b/c like a teacher, it can't save us, but it can convince us what is right and wrong. Once we realize what's right and wrong, then we realize our need for a savior.
---
Sometimes I wonder; how DO i get these things in the bible that those around me really don't seem to get? Is it because i GET things in the bible when i read them? no. in fact, i probably spend more time than others when i read the bible; i tend to think i'm a slow reader.
I think it's a combination of two things; God giving me a love and hard concept that the word of God is really important, and him showing me things everytime i read. alone i don't discover these things. even when i do read more than others, it's not because i DISCOVERED ideas; God revealed them to me.
so i leave 2 verses for you to chew on relating to me not discovering these ideas, but God revealing them to me:
1st Corinthians 2:14
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.
1st Peter 1:20-21
Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation.
For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake [as they were] moved by the Holy Ghost.
Galatians 3:24-25 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
But for some reason, TODAY i got it:
Romans 7:7
What shall we say then? [Is] the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
It is a schoolmaster, b/c like a teacher, it can't save us, but it can convince us what is right and wrong. Once we realize what's right and wrong, then we realize our need for a savior.
---
Sometimes I wonder; how DO i get these things in the bible that those around me really don't seem to get? Is it because i GET things in the bible when i read them? no. in fact, i probably spend more time than others when i read the bible; i tend to think i'm a slow reader.
I think it's a combination of two things; God giving me a love and hard concept that the word of God is really important, and him showing me things everytime i read. alone i don't discover these things. even when i do read more than others, it's not because i DISCOVERED ideas; God revealed them to me.
so i leave 2 verses for you to chew on relating to me not discovering these ideas, but God revealing them to me:
1st Corinthians 2:14
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.
1st Peter 1:20-21
Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation.
For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake [as they were] moved by the Holy Ghost.
Rick Meisel, Biblical Discernment Ministries:
"The Scriptures do not teach that any portion of the Word of God contains doctrines that are "less essential." Our Lord and Savior left no room for doubt on this subject: "It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word
that proceedeth out of the mouth of God" (Matt. 4:4)"
"In fact, why run so as to win (1 Corinthians 9:24)? If you have the "essentials" down, it's no big deal if you get deceived into other areas. What kind of a warning is Colossians 2:8 then anyway? So what if you're taken in by empty deceit! You have your essentials! Eat and drink (theologically speaking), for tomorrow we all go to heaven! WHAT A LIE! One cannot categorize Bible doctrine as very essential, not so very essential, less essential, non-essential, or whatever other type of human ranking system. Differences in "Importance," yes, but there are no doctrines that are more or less essential than others. The Bible does not divide doctrine into essential and non-essential. Paul labored to preach the whole counsel of God (Acts 20:27). Modern evangelicalism claims that certain doctrines are "essential" and others are "non-essential," and that Christian unity revolves strictly around the essentials, while the non-essentials have no meaning in regard to fellowship. But the Bible nowhere says that doctrine can be so divided. "The faith once delivered unto the saints" (Jude 3) describes that body of truth delivered to us by the Lord's Apostles through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. The entire body of truth is to be contended for. Timothy was to allow NO OTHER DOCTRINE to be taught (1 Timothy 1:3). There is no hint here that some Bible doctrine is essential and other doctrine is not."
think about that the next time you wonder whether or not to dive into the more obscure parts of the bible that you have never dived into, like the prophets or revelations. don't act they're too boring or too hard to study; if you need help, i gladly offer what services i can.
"The Scriptures do not teach that any portion of the Word of God contains doctrines that are "less essential." Our Lord and Savior left no room for doubt on this subject: "It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word
that proceedeth out of the mouth of God" (Matt. 4:4)"
"In fact, why run so as to win (1 Corinthians 9:24)? If you have the "essentials" down, it's no big deal if you get deceived into other areas. What kind of a warning is Colossians 2:8 then anyway? So what if you're taken in by empty deceit! You have your essentials! Eat and drink (theologically speaking), for tomorrow we all go to heaven! WHAT A LIE! One cannot categorize Bible doctrine as very essential, not so very essential, less essential, non-essential, or whatever other type of human ranking system. Differences in "Importance," yes, but there are no doctrines that are more or less essential than others. The Bible does not divide doctrine into essential and non-essential. Paul labored to preach the whole counsel of God (Acts 20:27). Modern evangelicalism claims that certain doctrines are "essential" and others are "non-essential," and that Christian unity revolves strictly around the essentials, while the non-essentials have no meaning in regard to fellowship. But the Bible nowhere says that doctrine can be so divided. "The faith once delivered unto the saints" (Jude 3) describes that body of truth delivered to us by the Lord's Apostles through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. The entire body of truth is to be contended for. Timothy was to allow NO OTHER DOCTRINE to be taught (1 Timothy 1:3). There is no hint here that some Bible doctrine is essential and other doctrine is not."
think about that the next time you wonder whether or not to dive into the more obscure parts of the bible that you have never dived into, like the prophets or revelations. don't act they're too boring or too hard to study; if you need help, i gladly offer what services i can.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)